Scholarlink

Background <p>Parent-Child Interaction Therapy (PCIT) has been effectively implemented for autistic youth and their families who need help reducing disruptive behaviors, promoting language development, and enhancing the parent-child relationship. However, like most autism-based interventions, the PCIT protocol was originally adapted <i>for</i> (rather than <i>with</i> or <i>by</i>) the autism community. A new wave of intervention research calls for input from autism advocates throughout each phase of the research process. The present study signifies the first step in the development and implementation of a pilot PCIT program with autistic youth and their families (i.e., PCIT-Autism).</p> Methods <p>Academic researchers collaborated alongside an Autism Community Advisory Board (CAB) comprised of autistic adults (<i>N</i> = 10) and caregivers of autistic youth (<i>N</i> = 14) to understand the current state of therapeutic services and their values for the development of an intervention to address autistic youth aggressive behaviors, when present.</p> Results <p>Five primary themes were generated from qualitative interviews with the Autism CAB related to psychological interventions: (1) Barriers to Accessibility, (2) Effectiveness, (3) Therapist Competence, (4) Topics, and (5) Format.</p> Conclusions <p>Recommendations from the Autism CAB encouraged a hybrid (in-person, group-based + individualized telehealth), time-limited PCIT model which incorporated autism-affirming psychoeducation and practice, childcare, as well as opportunities for community-building.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Collaborating with an autism community advisory board to develop a family-based, neurodiversity-affirming intervention: PCIT-Autism

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年12月5日

查看全文
  • Lauren Quetsch,
  • Emily Shah,
  • Julia Kiefer

摘要

Background

Parent-Child Interaction Therapy (PCIT) has been effectively implemented for autistic youth and their families who need help reducing disruptive behaviors, promoting language development, and enhancing the parent-child relationship. However, like most autism-based interventions, the PCIT protocol was originally adapted for (rather than with or by) the autism community. A new wave of intervention research calls for input from autism advocates throughout each phase of the research process. The present study signifies the first step in the development and implementation of a pilot PCIT program with autistic youth and their families (i.e., PCIT-Autism).

Methods

Academic researchers collaborated alongside an Autism Community Advisory Board (CAB) comprised of autistic adults (N = 10) and caregivers of autistic youth (N = 14) to understand the current state of therapeutic services and their values for the development of an intervention to address autistic youth aggressive behaviors, when present.

Results

Five primary themes were generated from qualitative interviews with the Autism CAB related to psychological interventions: (1) Barriers to Accessibility, (2) Effectiveness, (3) Therapist Competence, (4) Topics, and (5) Format.

Conclusions

Recommendations from the Autism CAB encouraged a hybrid (in-person, group-based + individualized telehealth), time-limited PCIT model which incorporated autism-affirming psychoeducation and practice, childcare, as well as opportunities for community-building.