Evaluating qualitative data analysis workshops from the perspective of public contributors

期刊论文
出版模式：

开放获取
发表日期：

2024年9月27日

查看全文

Alice Moult,
Carmel McGrath,
Kate Lippiett,
Caroline Coope,
Andrew Turner,
Simon Chillcott,
Linda Parton,
Pam Holloway,
Sally Dace,
Andy Gibson,
Clare Jinks,
Zoe Paskins,
Mari Carmen Portillo,
Cindy Mann,
Krysia Dziedzic

摘要

Background

The aim of this project is to evaluate public contributors’ experiences of their involvement in qualitative data analysis workshops during an on-going research project titled ‘Personalised Primary care for Patients with Multiple long-term conditions’.

Methods

Four qualitative data analysis workshops were designed and conducted between August and December 2023. We used the Cube evaluation framework (henceforth referred to as the Cube) to evaluate the workshops. The Cube suggests four domains for successful PPI (voice, agenda, change, contribute).Within Workshops One, Two and Three public contributors had to login to an account to access the Cube; this was modified in Workshop Four following feedback from public contributors.

Findings

Across the four workshops the Cube was completed 11 times. Across all four workshops, public contributors thought that their voice was heard, that there were diverse ways to contribute and that they led the agenda. Public contributors thought that researchers responded to their questions and issues, when necessary.

Conclusion

This evaluation has shown that public contributors can gain new skills and lead qualitative data analysis discussions.