Scholarlink

<p>While no longer present in their home state, emigrants generally retain political membership; but should they retain all the rights and privileges? A key question is emigrants’ right to political participation in their country of origin – the right to vote and the right to run for political office. While previous research has examined the normative implications and factors contributing to the spread of expatriate voting rights, less is known about the opinions of emigrants who would gain the franchise and those who did not migrate. Using a unique survey of the Nigerian diaspora in 11 countries around the world and a sample of “Nigerians at Home,” we find that, counterintuitively, those “at home” generally support expatriate political participation more than the emigrants themselves. Our analysis further suggests that a strong belief in a territorially unbounded global diaspora population is one important source of this support. Absence from the territory elicits contradictory reactions: for those abroad it weakens claims to participation, at the same time those in Nigeria that see free speech under attack see the diaspora as a voice that can speak on their behalf.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Who should vote? Membership and claims to expatriate political participation in the Nigerian diaspora

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年5月22日

查看全文
  • Aaron Erlich,
  • Thomas Soehl

摘要

While no longer present in their home state, emigrants generally retain political membership; but should they retain all the rights and privileges? A key question is emigrants’ right to political participation in their country of origin – the right to vote and the right to run for political office. While previous research has examined the normative implications and factors contributing to the spread of expatriate voting rights, less is known about the opinions of emigrants who would gain the franchise and those who did not migrate. Using a unique survey of the Nigerian diaspora in 11 countries around the world and a sample of “Nigerians at Home,” we find that, counterintuitively, those “at home” generally support expatriate political participation more than the emigrants themselves. Our analysis further suggests that a strong belief in a territorially unbounded global diaspora population is one important source of this support. Absence from the territory elicits contradictory reactions: for those abroad it weakens claims to participation, at the same time those in Nigeria that see free speech under attack see the diaspora as a voice that can speak on their behalf.