Scholarlink

Background <p>Tracking small-bodied animals in estuarine environments entails significant technological and analytical challenges. Diamond-backed terrapins are small (max 1.4&#xa0;kg) turtles that inhabit salt marshes of the eastern U.S. and the Gulf of Mexico. Terrapin movements have been studied with VHF radio telemetry, acoustic telemetry, and mark and recapture methods, which have indicated maximum straight-line movement distances &lt; 10&#xa0;km and mean home ranges &lt; 1 km<sup>2</sup>.</p> Results <p>We deployed 21 Argos satellite tags on adult female terrapins at two sites on Long Island, New York to better understand the spatial ecology of this imperiled species, and to test newly available tracking technology. We processed the location data three ways: (1) we used a location data filter to remove unlikely terrestrial and oceanic locations and applied a state-space model to account for Argos location errors, (2) we applied the state-space model to unfiltered data to determine the effects of not removing unlikely locations, and (3) we used only the highest quality location class 3 (LC 3) locations. We used the data resulting from each of these approaches to calculate four different movement metrics: summer home range size (95% minimum convex polygons (MCPs) and kernel density estimates (50% and 95% KDE, with both reference [href] and least squares cross validation [LSCV] bandwidths)), the total distance traveled from June to August, maximum distance traveled in one day, and daily movement rates. Home ranges estimated from the three processing techniques were similar in size and covered the same spatial areas. Estimates for total distance traveled, daily movement rates, and maximum distance traveled were similar between the state-space modeling techniques, but LC 3 estimated distances were twice as long. Movement metrics and home ranges were similar between the two study sites, despite differences in urbanization and bay size.</p> Conclusions <p>These results suggest that most movement metrics and home range estimates are fairly insensitive to these different analytical techniques, even at relatively smaller spatial scales. Additionally, our study indicates substantially larger home ranges and longer straight-line movements than VHF telemetry or sonic tag studies, highlighting the utility of satellite tags to improve our understanding of terrapin ecology and conservation.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Quantifying movements and home ranges of an estuarine turtle: the effects of urbanization and boundaries

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年6月17日

查看全文
  • Karissa Hough,
  • Matthew Sclafani,
  • Russell Burke

摘要

Background

Tracking small-bodied animals in estuarine environments entails significant technological and analytical challenges. Diamond-backed terrapins are small (max 1.4 kg) turtles that inhabit salt marshes of the eastern U.S. and the Gulf of Mexico. Terrapin movements have been studied with VHF radio telemetry, acoustic telemetry, and mark and recapture methods, which have indicated maximum straight-line movement distances < 10 km and mean home ranges < 1 km2.

Results

We deployed 21 Argos satellite tags on adult female terrapins at two sites on Long Island, New York to better understand the spatial ecology of this imperiled species, and to test newly available tracking technology. We processed the location data three ways: (1) we used a location data filter to remove unlikely terrestrial and oceanic locations and applied a state-space model to account for Argos location errors, (2) we applied the state-space model to unfiltered data to determine the effects of not removing unlikely locations, and (3) we used only the highest quality location class 3 (LC 3) locations. We used the data resulting from each of these approaches to calculate four different movement metrics: summer home range size (95% minimum convex polygons (MCPs) and kernel density estimates (50% and 95% KDE, with both reference [href] and least squares cross validation [LSCV] bandwidths)), the total distance traveled from June to August, maximum distance traveled in one day, and daily movement rates. Home ranges estimated from the three processing techniques were similar in size and covered the same spatial areas. Estimates for total distance traveled, daily movement rates, and maximum distance traveled were similar between the state-space modeling techniques, but LC 3 estimated distances were twice as long. Movement metrics and home ranges were similar between the two study sites, despite differences in urbanization and bay size.

Conclusions

These results suggest that most movement metrics and home range estimates are fairly insensitive to these different analytical techniques, even at relatively smaller spatial scales. Additionally, our study indicates substantially larger home ranges and longer straight-line movements than VHF telemetry or sonic tag studies, highlighting the utility of satellite tags to improve our understanding of terrapin ecology and conservation.