Scholarlink

Background <p>Long-acting injectable (LAI) hormonal contraception offers a promising approach to meet women’s pregnancy prevention needs. We sought to understand acceptability of and preferences for LAI hormonal contraception among US women, to optimize the design of a sustained-release LAI in development – including which durations to pursue.</p> Methods <p>We implemented a national cross-sectional online survey including a discrete choice experiment (DCE) with women ages 18–44 years currently using or interested in using contraception. Recruitment was via Prime Panels. DCE attributes included potential duration of effectiveness (6/12/24-months), effect on menses, side effects, and timing of return-to-fertility after use. We used mixed-multinomial logit models to analyze the data.</p> Results <p>Women (<i>n</i> = 1,029) were 28.6 years old on-average, from 49 US states. 30.9% were Black/African American; 11.6% Hispanic/Latina. 71.6% were nulliparous; 49.0% did not want a(nother) child. Common current contraceptive methods were birth control pills (37.4%), male condoms (35.7%), and withdrawal (19.8%); 18.9% reported having had an unintended pregnancy. In the DCE, women had strong negative preferences for: may cause heavier/unpredictable periods, mild headaches/nausea, slight weight gain, and delayed return-to-fertility (6–12 vs. 3 months), and positive preferences for: may cause no period, and shorter/lighter periods (all <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Women also preferred the 12-month to the 6-month duration (<i>p</i> = 0.03). When asked directly about their interest in an LAI with no/minimal side effects/effects on menses and quick return-to-fertility, 92.4% expressed interest, with two-thirds preferring a longer duration (12 or 24-months), and one-third the 6-month duration. Preference for the 6-month duration (vs. 12 or 24) was most highly associated with wanting a child within five years, and higher discomfort with hormones (both <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001).</p> Conclusions <p>US women report high interest in an LAI. Interest substantially decreases if the LAI may cause unwanted effects such as heavier/unpredictable periods, mild headaches/nausea, slight weight gain, or delayed return-to-fertility. While longer duration (12 + months) is preferred overall, having a 6-month option appears important especially for women who may want to get pregnant within the next few years, and those concerned about hormones (to try it before using a longer duration).</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Acceptability of and preferences for long-acting injectable hormonal contraception among US women: evidence from a national cross-sectional online survey

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年7月25日

查看全文
  • Ann Gottert,
  • Timothy Abuya,
  • Elizabeth Proos,
  • Isabella Johnson,
  • Nathan H. Dormer,
  • Ulrike Foley,
  • Grace Saul,
  • Lisa B. Haddad,
  • David R. Friend

摘要

Background

Long-acting injectable (LAI) hormonal contraception offers a promising approach to meet women’s pregnancy prevention needs. We sought to understand acceptability of and preferences for LAI hormonal contraception among US women, to optimize the design of a sustained-release LAI in development – including which durations to pursue.

Methods

We implemented a national cross-sectional online survey including a discrete choice experiment (DCE) with women ages 18–44 years currently using or interested in using contraception. Recruitment was via Prime Panels. DCE attributes included potential duration of effectiveness (6/12/24-months), effect on menses, side effects, and timing of return-to-fertility after use. We used mixed-multinomial logit models to analyze the data.

Results

Women (n = 1,029) were 28.6 years old on-average, from 49 US states. 30.9% were Black/African American; 11.6% Hispanic/Latina. 71.6% were nulliparous; 49.0% did not want a(nother) child. Common current contraceptive methods were birth control pills (37.4%), male condoms (35.7%), and withdrawal (19.8%); 18.9% reported having had an unintended pregnancy. In the DCE, women had strong negative preferences for: may cause heavier/unpredictable periods, mild headaches/nausea, slight weight gain, and delayed return-to-fertility (6–12 vs. 3 months), and positive preferences for: may cause no period, and shorter/lighter periods (all p < 0.001). Women also preferred the 12-month to the 6-month duration (p = 0.03). When asked directly about their interest in an LAI with no/minimal side effects/effects on menses and quick return-to-fertility, 92.4% expressed interest, with two-thirds preferring a longer duration (12 or 24-months), and one-third the 6-month duration. Preference for the 6-month duration (vs. 12 or 24) was most highly associated with wanting a child within five years, and higher discomfort with hormones (both p < 0.001).

Conclusions

US women report high interest in an LAI. Interest substantially decreases if the LAI may cause unwanted effects such as heavier/unpredictable periods, mild headaches/nausea, slight weight gain, or delayed return-to-fertility. While longer duration (12 + months) is preferred overall, having a 6-month option appears important especially for women who may want to get pregnant within the next few years, and those concerned about hormones (to try it before using a longer duration).