Scholarlink

Background <p>A large number of young women are not in education, employment, or training (NEET) in England. This group experiences poorer mental health and social outcomes than young women who work and study, and NEET young men. Gender disparities are compounded in deprived and&#xa0;coastal areas, where young women especially lack self-agency and aspirations. Research suggests that greater hope lowers risks of staying NEET and developing mental health problems. We co-developed a hope-focused intervention (HOPEFUL) for this group. HOPEFUL is a flexible modular programme, designed to help develop a more hopeful mindset that facilitates setting and pursuing personally meaningful goals. It is designed to be supported by a mentor, if possible selected by the participant from their existing social network. We aim to understand the feasibility of involving NEET young women and mentors in a trial of HOPEFUL conducted in coastal and adjacent local authority areas in Sussex, Kent and Medway, and East Anglia.</p> Methods <p>This protocol describes the feasibility stage of an adaptive assessor-blind pragmatic randomised controlled trial (RCT) with 1:1 allocation (stratified by age group and local authority area) to (1) mentor-supported HOPEFUL plus usual support versus (2) usual support with waitlist access to HOPEFUL materials. NEET young women (aged 16–25&#xa0;years) are recruited from local authority, charity and voluntary, and primary care services, as well as directly from the community using outreach, local advertising, social media, and peer networks. Our adaptive trial design incorporates a preliminary feasibility trial (<i>N</i> = 70) with progression to a definitive RCT (<i>N</i> = 248), as warranted. Feasibility outcomes (corresponding to the recruitment and retention of young women and mentors) will be assessed post-intervention (16&#xa0;weeks) against pre-specified progression criteria.</p> Discussion <p>Feasibility trial results will inform decisions about progression to a definitive RCT of the HOPEFUL intervention. If warranted, the latter will test whether HOPEFUL improves hope (primary outcome) and secondary outcomes (including mental health symptoms and social outcomes) compared to usual support services at 16&#xa0;weeks (primary endpoint) and 12-month follow-up. We will disseminate feasibility results using tailored outputs. In the longer term, we anticipate practice impacts through scaled-up access to HOPEFUL.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

A pragmatic adaptive trial of hope-focused mentoring to improve mental health and social outcomes for young women who are not in education, employment or training in deprived coastal areas (The Looking Forward Project): feasibility trial stage protocol

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年5月30日

查看全文
  • Clio Berry,
  • Jessica C Bird,
  • Stephen Bremner,
  • Saskia Eddy,
  • Lindsay Forbes,
  • Julia Fountain,
  • Paul McCrone,
  • Charlotte Rawlinson,
  • Jon Wilson,
  • Daniel Michelson

摘要

Background

A large number of young women are not in education, employment, or training (NEET) in England. This group experiences poorer mental health and social outcomes than young women who work and study, and NEET young men. Gender disparities are compounded in deprived and coastal areas, where young women especially lack self-agency and aspirations. Research suggests that greater hope lowers risks of staying NEET and developing mental health problems. We co-developed a hope-focused intervention (HOPEFUL) for this group. HOPEFUL is a flexible modular programme, designed to help develop a more hopeful mindset that facilitates setting and pursuing personally meaningful goals. It is designed to be supported by a mentor, if possible selected by the participant from their existing social network. We aim to understand the feasibility of involving NEET young women and mentors in a trial of HOPEFUL conducted in coastal and adjacent local authority areas in Sussex, Kent and Medway, and East Anglia.

Methods

This protocol describes the feasibility stage of an adaptive assessor-blind pragmatic randomised controlled trial (RCT) with 1:1 allocation (stratified by age group and local authority area) to (1) mentor-supported HOPEFUL plus usual support versus (2) usual support with waitlist access to HOPEFUL materials. NEET young women (aged 16–25 years) are recruited from local authority, charity and voluntary, and primary care services, as well as directly from the community using outreach, local advertising, social media, and peer networks. Our adaptive trial design incorporates a preliminary feasibility trial (N = 70) with progression to a definitive RCT (N = 248), as warranted. Feasibility outcomes (corresponding to the recruitment and retention of young women and mentors) will be assessed post-intervention (16 weeks) against pre-specified progression criteria.

Discussion

Feasibility trial results will inform decisions about progression to a definitive RCT of the HOPEFUL intervention. If warranted, the latter will test whether HOPEFUL improves hope (primary outcome) and secondary outcomes (including mental health symptoms and social outcomes) compared to usual support services at 16 weeks (primary endpoint) and 12-month follow-up. We will disseminate feasibility results using tailored outputs. In the longer term, we anticipate practice impacts through scaled-up access to HOPEFUL.