Scholarlink

<p>Non-contact surveying strategies such as terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) and digital close-range photogrammetry (DCRP), have recently become popular as surveying techniques due to their rapid deployment and high accuracy. The critical issue that researchers typically face is the limited number of LVDTs or dial gauges available in laboratories, and occasionally it might be physically challenging to install several gauges in the testing facilities. Consequently, the primary objective of this paper is to examine the present viability and benefits of employing TLS and DCRP techniques in monitoring geotechnical applications. Calibration of these methods was performed through two laboratory tests: (1) monitoring of secant pile walls (SPW) as well as the soil movements; and (2) axial compression tests on SPW. The findings reveal that the discrepancy between traditional measurement methods and the TLS approach is less than 3.0%, whereas the difference between traditional methods and DCRP is under 1.8%. Furthermore, both DCRP and TLS techniques are capable of precisely tracking initial deformations, geometric irregularities, deficiencies in the samples (including pre-buckling phenomena), and deformations of the soil tank at each stage of loading. In conclusion, TLS and DCRP methods were found to offer accurate and advantageous alternatives for geotechnical monitoring, notably their capacity for the automatic collection and analysis of an unlimited number of measurement points.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Applicability of 3D laser scanning and close-range photogrammetry for geotechnical laboratory tests

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年12月11日

查看全文
  • Ali M. Basha,
  • Hany El Naggar,
  • Mohamed M. Sherif,
  • Mohamed H. Zakaria

摘要

Non-contact surveying strategies such as terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) and digital close-range photogrammetry (DCRP), have recently become popular as surveying techniques due to their rapid deployment and high accuracy. The critical issue that researchers typically face is the limited number of LVDTs or dial gauges available in laboratories, and occasionally it might be physically challenging to install several gauges in the testing facilities. Consequently, the primary objective of this paper is to examine the present viability and benefits of employing TLS and DCRP techniques in monitoring geotechnical applications. Calibration of these methods was performed through two laboratory tests: (1) monitoring of secant pile walls (SPW) as well as the soil movements; and (2) axial compression tests on SPW. The findings reveal that the discrepancy between traditional measurement methods and the TLS approach is less than 3.0%, whereas the difference between traditional methods and DCRP is under 1.8%. Furthermore, both DCRP and TLS techniques are capable of precisely tracking initial deformations, geometric irregularities, deficiencies in the samples (including pre-buckling phenomena), and deformations of the soil tank at each stage of loading. In conclusion, TLS and DCRP methods were found to offer accurate and advantageous alternatives for geotechnical monitoring, notably their capacity for the automatic collection and analysis of an unlimited number of measurement points.