Scholarlink

Background <p>Insect Ionotropic Receptors (IRs) are a relatively uncharted territory. Some studies have documented IR activation by recording neuronal activity in situ, others by their heterologous expression in <i>Xenopus</i> oocytes or mis-expressing IRs from <i>Drosophila melanogaster</i> or from the related <i>D. sechellia</i> into the <i>D. melanogaster</i> “ionotropic receptor decoder” neuron, which lacks the endogenous tuning receptor subunit but expresses IR-coreceptors.</p> Results <p>In this study, we first made use of <i>Drosophila</i> olfactory sensory neurons (OSNs) different from the “ionotropic receptor decoder”, demonstrating that by replacing or introducing IRs alongside the native <i>D. melanogaster</i> ones, functional heteromeric complexes can be formed. IR41a1 from the lepidopteran <i>Cydia pomonella</i> exhibits binding to polyamines and the IR75d from the dipteran <i>Drosophila suzukii</i> binds hexanoic acid. Secondly, expressing <i>D. suzukii</i>’s putative acid sensor IR64a into the “ionotropic receptor decoder” of <i>D. melanogaster</i> inhibits the response to the main activators of neighboring neurons from the same sensillum, despite that IR64a does not respond to acids. In situ hybridization on the antennae of <i>D. suzukii</i> unveils wide expression of IR64a in neurons proximal to the sacculus. Structural modeling analysis does not explain its absence of binding to acids; conversely, this approach identifies key amino acids features explaining the binding of hexanoic acid by IR75d. Finally, we have also explored alternative methods to heterologously express IRs based on Human Embryonic Kidney cells (HEK293). Despite observing correct expression of IRs in transfected cells through immunohistochemistry experiments, this approach did not achieve successful deorphanization of these receptors.</p> Conclusion <p>Our findings highlight the potential use of <i>Drosophila</i> OSNs as a valuable tool for functional characterization of IRs from different insect species: for the first time, we have provided evidence of IR-functionalities within alternative OSNs from the <i>Drosophila</i>’s "ionotropic receptor decoder” neuron to functionally characterize and deorphanize IRs from lineages that are evolutionarily distant from the <i>D. melanogaster</i> subgroup, contributing to the understanding of chemosensory modalities in <i>D. suzukii</i> and <i>C. pomonella</i>, two globally significant agricultural pests. Additionally, the unsuccessful deorphanization in HEK cells highlights the complex requirements for IR functionality, supporting the use of <i>Drosophila</i> OSNs as a more suitable expression system.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Alternative strategies based on transgenic Drosophila melanogaster for the functional characterization of insect Ionotropic Receptors

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年6月9日

查看全文
  • Cristina M. Crava,
  • William B. Walker III,
  • Alberto Maria Cattaneo

摘要

Background

Insect Ionotropic Receptors (IRs) are a relatively uncharted territory. Some studies have documented IR activation by recording neuronal activity in situ, others by their heterologous expression in Xenopus oocytes or mis-expressing IRs from Drosophila melanogaster or from the related D. sechellia into the D. melanogaster “ionotropic receptor decoder” neuron, which lacks the endogenous tuning receptor subunit but expresses IR-coreceptors.

Results

In this study, we first made use of Drosophila olfactory sensory neurons (OSNs) different from the “ionotropic receptor decoder”, demonstrating that by replacing or introducing IRs alongside the native D. melanogaster ones, functional heteromeric complexes can be formed. IR41a1 from the lepidopteran Cydia pomonella exhibits binding to polyamines and the IR75d from the dipteran Drosophila suzukii binds hexanoic acid. Secondly, expressing D. suzukii’s putative acid sensor IR64a into the “ionotropic receptor decoder” of D. melanogaster inhibits the response to the main activators of neighboring neurons from the same sensillum, despite that IR64a does not respond to acids. In situ hybridization on the antennae of D. suzukii unveils wide expression of IR64a in neurons proximal to the sacculus. Structural modeling analysis does not explain its absence of binding to acids; conversely, this approach identifies key amino acids features explaining the binding of hexanoic acid by IR75d. Finally, we have also explored alternative methods to heterologously express IRs based on Human Embryonic Kidney cells (HEK293). Despite observing correct expression of IRs in transfected cells through immunohistochemistry experiments, this approach did not achieve successful deorphanization of these receptors.

Conclusion

Our findings highlight the potential use of Drosophila OSNs as a valuable tool for functional characterization of IRs from different insect species: for the first time, we have provided evidence of IR-functionalities within alternative OSNs from the Drosophila’s "ionotropic receptor decoder” neuron to functionally characterize and deorphanize IRs from lineages that are evolutionarily distant from the D. melanogaster subgroup, contributing to the understanding of chemosensory modalities in D. suzukii and C. pomonella, two globally significant agricultural pests. Additionally, the unsuccessful deorphanization in HEK cells highlights the complex requirements for IR functionality, supporting the use of Drosophila OSNs as a more suitable expression system.