Background <p>Tumour dosimetry after radionuclide therapy using <sup>177</sup>Lu-labelled radiopharmaceuticals requires determination of the <sup>177</sup>Lu mean concentration, but this is challenging as tumours are often small, or <sup>177</sup>Lu activity is present in nearby organs or other tumours. Here we present a comparison of methods for determination of <sup>177</sup>Lu mean concentration, and in turn absorbed tumour dose, applied to a small number of patients with prostate cancer treated by [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-PSMA I&amp;T. For application of each method, specific criteria on tumour diameter and tumour-background ratio must be fulfilled.</p> Results <p>Eighteen tumours in 9 patients were analyzed. Several methods, the so-called Small Volume of Interest (VOI) with a 20&#xa0;mm diameter sphere, Large VOI and Isocontour methods, were found to be in good agreement. Relative to the chosen reference method (Isocontour method with partial volume correction), the relative percentage differences of <sup>177</sup>Lu concentration using either of these methods were in the range (-23)–26%. The relative differences of absorbed doses were in the range (-16)–19%.</p> Conclusions <p>The agreement between the methods permits a comparison between dosimetry studies, where some of these methods are applied. As the application criteria are complementary, it is possible to include both small (&gt; 15&#xa0;mm diameter) solitary tumours and larger (&gt; 30&#xa0;mm diameter), possibly non-solitary, tumours in a dosimetry study.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Comparison of tumour segmentation methods for dosimetry in [177Lu]Lu-PSMA I&T treated patients with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer

  • Peter Frøhlich Staanum,
  • Peter Iversen

摘要

Background

Tumour dosimetry after radionuclide therapy using 177Lu-labelled radiopharmaceuticals requires determination of the 177Lu mean concentration, but this is challenging as tumours are often small, or 177Lu activity is present in nearby organs or other tumours. Here we present a comparison of methods for determination of 177Lu mean concentration, and in turn absorbed tumour dose, applied to a small number of patients with prostate cancer treated by [177Lu]Lu-PSMA I&T. For application of each method, specific criteria on tumour diameter and tumour-background ratio must be fulfilled.

Results

Eighteen tumours in 9 patients were analyzed. Several methods, the so-called Small Volume of Interest (VOI) with a 20 mm diameter sphere, Large VOI and Isocontour methods, were found to be in good agreement. Relative to the chosen reference method (Isocontour method with partial volume correction), the relative percentage differences of 177Lu concentration using either of these methods were in the range (-23)–26%. The relative differences of absorbed doses were in the range (-16)–19%.

Conclusions

The agreement between the methods permits a comparison between dosimetry studies, where some of these methods are applied. As the application criteria are complementary, it is possible to include both small (> 15 mm diameter) solitary tumours and larger (> 30 mm diameter), possibly non-solitary, tumours in a dosimetry study.