Scholarlink

Background <p>Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is often diagnosed using gadoxetate disodium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (EOB-MRI). Standardized reporting according to the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) can improve Gd-MRI interpretation but is rather complex and time-consuming. These limitations could potentially be alleviated using recent deep learning-based segmentation and classification methods such as nnU-Net. The study aims to create and evaluate an automatic segmentation model for HCC risk assessment, according to LI-RADS v2018 using nnU-Net.</p> Methods <p>For this single-center retrospective study, 602 patients at risk for HCC were included, who had dynamic EOB-MRI examinations between 05/2005 and 09/2022, containing ≥ LR-3 lesion(s). Manual lesion segmentations in semantic segmentation masks as LR-3, LR-4, LR-5 or LR-M served as ground truth. A set of U-Net models with 14 input channels was trained using the nnU-Net framework for automatic segmentation. Lesion detection, LI-RADS classification, and instance segmentation metrics were calculated by post-processing the semantic segmentation outputs of the final model ensemble. For the external evaluation, a modified version of the LiverHccSeg dataset was used.</p> Results <p>The final training/internal test/external test cohorts included 383/219/16 patients. In the three cohorts, LI-RADS lesions (≥ LR-3 and LR-M) ≥ 10&#xa0;mm were detected with sensitivities of 0.41–0.85/0.40–0.90/0.83 (LR-5: 0.85/0.90/0.83) and positive predictive values of 0.70–0.94/0.67–0.88/0.90 (LR-5: 0.94/0.88/0.90). F1 scores for LI-RADS classification of detected lesions ranged between 0.48–0.69/0.47–0.74/0.84 (LR-5: 0.69/0.74/0.84). Median per lesion Sørensen–Dice coefficients were between 0.61–0.74/0.52–0.77/0.84 (LR-5: 0.74/0.77/0.84).</p> Conclusion <p>Deep learning-based HCC risk assessment according to LI-RADS can be implemented as automatically generated tumor risk maps using out-of-the-box image segmentation tools with high detection performance for LR-5 lesions. Before translation into clinical practice, further improvements in automatic LI-RADS classification, for example through large multi-center studies, would be desirable.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

LI-RADS-based hepatocellular carcinoma risk mapping using contrast-enhanced MRI and self-configuring deep learning

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年3月17日

查看全文
  • Róbert Stollmayer,
  • Selda Güven,
  • Christian Marcel Heidt,
  • Kai Schlamp,
  • Pál Novák Kaposi,
  • Oyunbileg von Stackelberg,
  • Hans-Ulrich Kauczor,
  • Miriam Klauss,
  • Philipp Mayer

摘要

Background

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is often diagnosed using gadoxetate disodium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (EOB-MRI). Standardized reporting according to the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) can improve Gd-MRI interpretation but is rather complex and time-consuming. These limitations could potentially be alleviated using recent deep learning-based segmentation and classification methods such as nnU-Net. The study aims to create and evaluate an automatic segmentation model for HCC risk assessment, according to LI-RADS v2018 using nnU-Net.

Methods

For this single-center retrospective study, 602 patients at risk for HCC were included, who had dynamic EOB-MRI examinations between 05/2005 and 09/2022, containing ≥ LR-3 lesion(s). Manual lesion segmentations in semantic segmentation masks as LR-3, LR-4, LR-5 or LR-M served as ground truth. A set of U-Net models with 14 input channels was trained using the nnU-Net framework for automatic segmentation. Lesion detection, LI-RADS classification, and instance segmentation metrics were calculated by post-processing the semantic segmentation outputs of the final model ensemble. For the external evaluation, a modified version of the LiverHccSeg dataset was used.

Results

The final training/internal test/external test cohorts included 383/219/16 patients. In the three cohorts, LI-RADS lesions (≥ LR-3 and LR-M) ≥ 10 mm were detected with sensitivities of 0.41–0.85/0.40–0.90/0.83 (LR-5: 0.85/0.90/0.83) and positive predictive values of 0.70–0.94/0.67–0.88/0.90 (LR-5: 0.94/0.88/0.90). F1 scores for LI-RADS classification of detected lesions ranged between 0.48–0.69/0.47–0.74/0.84 (LR-5: 0.69/0.74/0.84). Median per lesion Sørensen–Dice coefficients were between 0.61–0.74/0.52–0.77/0.84 (LR-5: 0.74/0.77/0.84).

Conclusion

Deep learning-based HCC risk assessment according to LI-RADS can be implemented as automatically generated tumor risk maps using out-of-the-box image segmentation tools with high detection performance for LR-5 lesions. Before translation into clinical practice, further improvements in automatic LI-RADS classification, for example through large multi-center studies, would be desirable.