<p>To measure the size of an earthquake, we can use two physically different quantities: the radiated seismic energy <InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="40623_2025_2278_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="16" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="23" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(E_{{\text{R}}}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi>E</mi> <mtext>R</mtext> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, from which seismic magnitude scales are defined, and the seismic moment <InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="40623_2025_2278_Article_IEq2.gif" Format="GIF" Height="16" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="24" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(M_{0}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi>M</mi> <mn>0</mn> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. The former depends on the dynamic process of earthquake faulting, whereas the latter does not. Nevertheless, if there exists a scaling relation between <InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="40623_2025_2278_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="16" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="23" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(E_{{\text{R}}}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi>E</mi> <mtext>R</mtext> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> and <InlineEquation ID="IEq4"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="40623_2025_2278_Article_IEq2.gif" Format="GIF" Height="16" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="24" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(M_{0}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi>M</mi> <mn>0</mn> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, we can define a magnitude scale derived from the seismic moment. The widely accepted moment magnitude scale, <InlineEquation ID="IEq5"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="40623_2025_2278_Article_IEq5.gif" Format="GIF" Height="19" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="178" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(M_{{\text{w}}} = {{(\log M_{0} - 9.1)} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{(\log M_{0} - 9.1)} {1.5}}} \right. \kern-0pt} {1.5}}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <msub> <mi>M</mi> <mtext>w</mtext> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mrow> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mo>log</mo> <msub> <mi>M</mi> <mn>0</mn> </msub> <mo>-</mo> <mn>9.1</mn> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> <mrow> <mfenced open="/"> <mphantom> <mpadded width="0pt"> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mo>log</mo> <msub> <mi>M</mi> <mn>0</mn> </msub> <mo>-</mo> <mn>9.1</mn> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> <mrow> <mn>1.5</mn> </mrow> </mpadded> </mphantom> </mfenced> </mrow> <mrow> <mn>1.5</mn> </mrow> </mrow> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> in MKS units, was established by substituting the scaling relation of <InlineEquation ID="IEq6"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="40623_2025_2278_Article_IEq6.gif" Format="GIF" Height="18" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="128" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(E_{{\text{R}}} = 5 \times 10^{ - 5} M_{0}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <msub> <mi>E</mi> <mtext>R</mtext> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>5</mn> <mo>×</mo> <msup> <mn>10</mn> <mrow> <mo>-</mo> <mn>5</mn> </mrow> </msup> <msub> <mi>M</mi> <mn>0</mn> </msub> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> into the Gutenberg-Richter empirical energy–magnitude relation, <InlineEquation ID="IEq7"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="40623_2025_2278_Article_IEq7.gif" Format="GIF" Height="17" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="151" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\log E_{{\text{R}}} = 1.5M_{{\text{s}}} + 4.8\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mo>log</mo> <msub> <mi>E</mi> <mtext>R</mtext> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1.5</mn> <msub> <mi>M</mi> <mtext>s</mtext> </msub> <mo>+</mo> <mn>4.8</mn> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. The above scaling relation comes from the energy–moment relation, <InlineEquation ID="IEq8"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="40623_2025_2278_Article_IEq8.gif" Format="GIF" Height="19" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="129" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(E_{{\text{R}}} = ({{\Delta \tau } \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{\Delta \tau } {2\mu }}} \right. \kern-0pt} {2\mu }})M_{0}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <msub> <mi>E</mi> <mtext>R</mtext> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mrow> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mi> <mi>τ</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mfenced open="/"> <mphantom> <mpadded width="0pt"> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mi> <mi>τ</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mn>2</mn> <mi>μ</mi> </mrow> </mpadded> </mphantom> </mfenced> </mrow> <mrow> <mn>2</mn> <mi>μ</mi> </mrow> </mrow> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> <msub> <mi>M</mi> <mn>0</mn> </msub> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, based on a simplified energy balance equation in earthquake faulting with a uniform stress drop <InlineEquation ID="IEq9"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="40623_2025_2278_Article_IEq9.gif" Format="GIF" Height="14" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="24" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\Delta \tau\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mi> <mi>τ</mi> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. However, this energy–moment relation is a bit strange, because the right-hand side depends exclusively on the final static state of earthquake faulting, while the left-hand side must depend on the whole dynamic process of earthquake faulting. Theoretically, the radiated seismic energy <InlineEquation ID="IEq10"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="40623_2025_2278_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="16" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="23" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(E_{{\text{R}}}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi>E</mi> <mtext>R</mtext> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> is expressed as a function of cumulative moment <InlineEquation ID="IEq11"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="40623_2025_2278_Article_IEq11.gif" Format="GIF" Height="19" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="43" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(M_{0} (t)\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <msub> <mi>M</mi> <mn>0</mn> </msub> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>t</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. In the case of a self-similar circular crack expanding at a constant rupture velocity <InlineEquation ID="IEq12"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="40623_2025_2278_Article_IEq12.gif" Format="GIF" Height="12" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="14" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(v_{{\text{r}}}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi>v</mi> <mtext>r</mtext> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> with a uniform stress drop <InlineEquation ID="IEq13"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="40623_2025_2278_Article_IEq9.gif" Format="GIF" Height="14" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="24" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\Delta \tau\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mi> <mi>τ</mi> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, the cumulative moment is calculated as <InlineEquation ID="IEq14"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="40623_2025_2278_Article_IEq14.gif" Format="GIF" Height="20" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="159" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(M_{0} (t) = ({{16} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{16} 7}} \right. \kern-0pt} 7})\Delta \tau v_{{\text{r}}}^{3} t^{3}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <msub> <mi>M</mi> <mn>0</mn> </msub> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>t</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> <mo>=</mo> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mrow> <mn>16</mn> <mrow> <mfenced open="/"> <mphantom> <mpadded width="0pt"> <mn>167</mn> </mpadded> </mphantom> </mfenced> </mrow> <mn>7</mn> </mrow> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mi> <mi>τ</mi> <msubsup> <mi>v</mi> <mrow> <mtext>r</mtext> </mrow> <mn>3</mn> </msubsup> <msup> <mi>t</mi> <mn>3</mn> </msup> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. Substituting this expression into the theoretical formula of <InlineEquation ID="IEq15"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="40623_2025_2278_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="16" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="23" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(E_{{\text{R}}}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi>E</mi> <mtext>R</mtext> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, we obtain a simple energy–moment relation, <InlineEquation ID="IEq16"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="40623_2025_2278_Article_IEq16.gif" Format="GIF" Height="20" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="179" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(E_{{\text{R}}} = ({{v_{{\text{r}}} } \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{v_{{\text{r}}} } {V_{{\text{S}}} }}} \right. \kern-0pt} {V_{{\text{S}}} }})^{3} ({{\Delta \tau } \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{\Delta \tau } \mu }} \right. \kern-0pt} \mu })M_{0}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <msub> <mi>E</mi> <mtext>R</mtext> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <msup> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mrow> <msub> <mi>v</mi> <mtext>r</mtext> </msub> <mrow> <mfenced open="/"> <mphantom> <mpadded width="0pt"> <msub> <mi>v</mi> <mtext>r</mtext> </msub> <msub> <mi>V</mi> <mtext>S</mtext> </msub> </mpadded> </mphantom> </mfenced> </mrow> <msub> <mi>V</mi> <mtext>S</mtext> </msub> </mrow> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> <mn>3</mn> </msup> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mrow> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mi> <mi>τ</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mfenced open="/"> <mphantom> <mpadded width="0pt"> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mi> <mi>τ</mi> </mrow> <mi>μ</mi> </mpadded> </mphantom> </mfenced> </mrow> <mi>μ</mi> </mrow> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> <msub> <mi>M</mi> <mn>0</mn> </msub> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, which leads to the correction of the original moment magnitude scale <InlineEquation ID="IEq17"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="40623_2025_2278_Article_IEq17.gif" Format="GIF" Height="16" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="26" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(M_{{\text{w}}}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi>M</mi> <mtext>w</mtext> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> as <InlineEquation ID="IEq18"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="40623_2025_2278_Article_IEq18.gif" Format="GIF" Height="19" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="217" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(M^{\prime}_{{\text{w}}} = M_{{\text{w}}} + 2\log ({{v_{{\text{r}}} } \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{v_{{\text{r}}} } {V_{{\text{S}}} }}} \right. \kern-0pt} {V_{{\text{S}}} }}) + 0.2\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <msubsup> <mi>M</mi> <mtext>w</mtext> <mo>′</mo> </msubsup> <mo>=</mo> <msub> <mi>M</mi> <mtext>w</mtext> </msub> <mo>+</mo> <mn>2</mn> <mo>log</mo> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mrow> <msub> <mi>v</mi> <mtext>r</mtext> </msub> <mrow> <mfenced open="/"> <mphantom> <mpadded width="0pt"> <msub> <mi>v</mi> <mtext>r</mtext> </msub> <msub> <mi>V</mi> <mtext>S</mtext> </msub> </mpadded> </mphantom> </mfenced> </mrow> <msub> <mi>V</mi> <mtext>S</mtext> </msub> </mrow> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> <mo>+</mo> <mn>0.2</mn> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>.</p> Graphical Abstract <p></p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

A theoretical basis of the moment magnitude scale

  • Mitsuhiro Matsu’ura

摘要

To measure the size of an earthquake, we can use two physically different quantities: the radiated seismic energy \(E_{{\text{R}}}\) E R , from which seismic magnitude scales are defined, and the seismic moment \(M_{0}\) M 0 . The former depends on the dynamic process of earthquake faulting, whereas the latter does not. Nevertheless, if there exists a scaling relation between \(E_{{\text{R}}}\) E R and \(M_{0}\) M 0 , we can define a magnitude scale derived from the seismic moment. The widely accepted moment magnitude scale, \(M_{{\text{w}}} = {{(\log M_{0} - 9.1)} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{(\log M_{0} - 9.1)} {1.5}}} \right. \kern-0pt} {1.5}}\) M w = ( log M 0 - 9.1 ) ( log M 0 - 9.1 ) 1.5 1.5 in MKS units, was established by substituting the scaling relation of \(E_{{\text{R}}} = 5 \times 10^{ - 5} M_{0}\) E R = 5 × 10 - 5 M 0 into the Gutenberg-Richter empirical energy–magnitude relation, \(\log E_{{\text{R}}} = 1.5M_{{\text{s}}} + 4.8\) log E R = 1.5 M s + 4.8 . The above scaling relation comes from the energy–moment relation, \(E_{{\text{R}}} = ({{\Delta \tau } \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{\Delta \tau } {2\mu }}} \right. \kern-0pt} {2\mu }})M_{0}\) E R = ( Δ τ Δ τ 2 μ 2 μ ) M 0 , based on a simplified energy balance equation in earthquake faulting with a uniform stress drop \(\Delta \tau\) Δ τ . However, this energy–moment relation is a bit strange, because the right-hand side depends exclusively on the final static state of earthquake faulting, while the left-hand side must depend on the whole dynamic process of earthquake faulting. Theoretically, the radiated seismic energy \(E_{{\text{R}}}\) E R is expressed as a function of cumulative moment \(M_{0} (t)\) M 0 ( t ) . In the case of a self-similar circular crack expanding at a constant rupture velocity \(v_{{\text{r}}}\) v r with a uniform stress drop \(\Delta \tau\) Δ τ , the cumulative moment is calculated as \(M_{0} (t) = ({{16} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{16} 7}} \right. \kern-0pt} 7})\Delta \tau v_{{\text{r}}}^{3} t^{3}\) M 0 ( t ) = ( 16 167 7 ) Δ τ v r 3 t 3 . Substituting this expression into the theoretical formula of \(E_{{\text{R}}}\) E R , we obtain a simple energy–moment relation, \(E_{{\text{R}}} = ({{v_{{\text{r}}} } \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{v_{{\text{r}}} } {V_{{\text{S}}} }}} \right. \kern-0pt} {V_{{\text{S}}} }})^{3} ({{\Delta \tau } \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{\Delta \tau } \mu }} \right. \kern-0pt} \mu })M_{0}\) E R = ( v r v r V S V S ) 3 ( Δ τ Δ τ μ μ ) M 0 , which leads to the correction of the original moment magnitude scale \(M_{{\text{w}}}\) M w as \(M^{\prime}_{{\text{w}}} = M_{{\text{w}}} + 2\log ({{v_{{\text{r}}} } \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{v_{{\text{r}}} } {V_{{\text{S}}} }}} \right. \kern-0pt} {V_{{\text{S}}} }}) + 0.2\) M w = M w + 2 log ( v r v r V S V S ) + 0.2 .

Graphical Abstract