<p>Drăguşin et al. (2025) interpreted deposits at Mangalia (Romania) as evidence of a two-phase tectonic event (~ 14&#xa0;m subsidence and uplift) during the 18th–19th centuries. Based on multi-proxy data from the same site, we show that this scenario is inconsistent with regional tectonics, stratigraphy, and archaeology. The deposits instead record the gradual infill of a coastal depression episodically affected by extreme marine incursions.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

No evidence for a 10-m historical tectonic uplift at Mangalia, (Romanian Black Sea coast): comment on Drăguşin et al. (2025)

  • Alfred Vespremeanu-Stroe,
  • Luminița Preoteasa,
  • Laurențiu Țuțuianu,
  • Mihaela Dobre,
  • Florin Zăinescu,
  • Anca Dan,
  • Edward Anthony

摘要

Drăguşin et al. (2025) interpreted deposits at Mangalia (Romania) as evidence of a two-phase tectonic event (~ 14 m subsidence and uplift) during the 18th–19th centuries. Based on multi-proxy data from the same site, we show that this scenario is inconsistent with regional tectonics, stratigraphy, and archaeology. The deposits instead record the gradual infill of a coastal depression episodically affected by extreme marine incursions.