Scholarlink

Objectives <p>To investigate the biomechanical effects of attachment position (buccal vs. palatal) and the integration of pressure ridges on maxillary arch expansion with clear aligners using finite element analysis.</p> Methods <p>Five 3D finite element models were constructed to simulate 0.2&#xa0;mm of buccal expansion with different auxiliary configurations: (A) no attachment; (B) buccal attachments; (C) palatal attachments; (D) buccal attachments combined with palatal pressure ridges; and (E) palatal attachments combined with buccal pressure ridges. Biomechanical analysis quantified tooth displacement and stress distribution across tooth roots and periodontal ligament.</p> Results <p>Groups A-D exhibited significant buccal inclination in premolars and first molars, while second molar expansion remained limited. In contrast, Group E demonstrated a restricted expansion pattern. Regarding attachment position, palatal attachments (Group C) generated greater crown displacement in the mid-posterior segment (second premolar: 0.058&#xa0;mm; first molar: 0.042&#xa0;mm) compared to buccal attachments (Group B). Among the five groups, the buccal attachments combined with palatal pressure ridges (Group D) demonstrated superior biomechanical performance, achieving the greatest first molar expansion (0.057&#xa0;mm) and favorable torque control (first molar: 3.42°/mm; second molar: 2.96°/mm). Notably, palatal attachments (Groups C and E) induced significantly higher von Mises stresses on the roots.</p> Conclusions <p>Maxillary arch expansion with clear aligners is primarily achieved by buccal inclination of the posterior teeth. The configuration combining buccal attachments with palatal pressure ridges demonstrates biomechanical advantages, including enhanced crown displacement, better torque control, and favorable stress distribution.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Biomechanical effects of attachment position and pressure ridge design on maxillary arch expansion with clear aligners: a finite element analysis

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年2月23日

查看全文
  • Yuanyuan Zheng,
  • Runzhi Guo,
  • Qingyi Dai,
  • Weiran Li,
  • Ping Wen,
  • Min Wu,
  • Yifan Lin

摘要

Objectives

To investigate the biomechanical effects of attachment position (buccal vs. palatal) and the integration of pressure ridges on maxillary arch expansion with clear aligners using finite element analysis.

Methods

Five 3D finite element models were constructed to simulate 0.2 mm of buccal expansion with different auxiliary configurations: (A) no attachment; (B) buccal attachments; (C) palatal attachments; (D) buccal attachments combined with palatal pressure ridges; and (E) palatal attachments combined with buccal pressure ridges. Biomechanical analysis quantified tooth displacement and stress distribution across tooth roots and periodontal ligament.

Results

Groups A-D exhibited significant buccal inclination in premolars and first molars, while second molar expansion remained limited. In contrast, Group E demonstrated a restricted expansion pattern. Regarding attachment position, palatal attachments (Group C) generated greater crown displacement in the mid-posterior segment (second premolar: 0.058 mm; first molar: 0.042 mm) compared to buccal attachments (Group B). Among the five groups, the buccal attachments combined with palatal pressure ridges (Group D) demonstrated superior biomechanical performance, achieving the greatest first molar expansion (0.057 mm) and favorable torque control (first molar: 3.42°/mm; second molar: 2.96°/mm). Notably, palatal attachments (Groups C and E) induced significantly higher von Mises stresses on the roots.

Conclusions

Maxillary arch expansion with clear aligners is primarily achieved by buccal inclination of the posterior teeth. The configuration combining buccal attachments with palatal pressure ridges demonstrates biomechanical advantages, including enhanced crown displacement, better torque control, and favorable stress distribution.