Scholarlink

<p>We propose a quantitative metric, the Index of Vibration Influence (<i>IVI</i>), to assess how external random vibrations affect resonant MEMS scanning mirrors that embed a mirror-angle sensor. The setup excites the mirror with PSD-specified random profiles while the mirror is driven near its resonant frequency. The <i>IVI</i><sub><i>o</i></sub>, which quantifies vibration‑induced scan‑angle perturbations, is defined at the operating frequency (<i>f</i><sub><i>o</i></sub>), as the ratio of the mirror-angle spectra influenced by external vibration to those without random vibration. We validate the linearity error of the embedded sensor as small as 1.25% compared with an external PSM. Using the validated sensor, <i>IVI</i><sub><i>o</i></sub> was evaluated at − 45 dB, corresponding to 0.17° angle perturbations at 30.18° OSA, when random vibration was applied at an acceleration level 30% higher in RMS than the IEC 62,498‑3 requirement.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Reliability evaluation of MEMS scanning mirrors with an embedded mirror-monitoring sensor under external random vibrations

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年2月5日

查看全文
  • Dohyeon Jeong,
  • Myeongseop Kim,
  • Wonsang Jo,
  • Jong-Hyun Lee

摘要

We propose a quantitative metric, the Index of Vibration Influence (IVI), to assess how external random vibrations affect resonant MEMS scanning mirrors that embed a mirror-angle sensor. The setup excites the mirror with PSD-specified random profiles while the mirror is driven near its resonant frequency. The IVIo, which quantifies vibration‑induced scan‑angle perturbations, is defined at the operating frequency (fo), as the ratio of the mirror-angle spectra influenced by external vibration to those without random vibration. We validate the linearity error of the embedded sensor as small as 1.25% compared with an external PSM. Using the validated sensor, IVIo was evaluated at − 45 dB, corresponding to 0.17° angle perturbations at 30.18° OSA, when random vibration was applied at an acceleration level 30% higher in RMS than the IEC 62,498‑3 requirement.