Scholarlink

<p>Positron emission tomography (PET) is the current gold standard for assessing amyloid burden in vivo and is often quantified using standardized uptake value ratios (SUVRs). We evaluated the performance of four SUVR calculation methods for predicting amyloid deposition at autopsy in a group of oldest-old participants. We analyzed data from 165 participants from <i>The 90 + Study</i> with both florbetapir PET and postmortem assessments. PET scans were re-aligned to an older age template using a custom MRI-free pipeline. SUVRs were computed from two target regions—combined posterior cingulate and precuneus (PC<sup>2</sup>) and an established cortical summary region—and two reference regions—white matter (WM) and cerebellar gray matter. Their predictive performance for amyloid beta positivity (Thal phase ≥ 3) and neuritic plaque positivity (moderate or frequent CERAD score) was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic analyses, including DeLong’s test for comparisons. Participants had a mean (± standard deviation) age at PET of 94 ± 3 years, and age at death of 97 ± 4 years. Most participants had amyloid at autopsy: 113 (68%) were amyloid beta positive, and 104 (63%) were neuritic plaque positive. The best performing SUVR was the PC<sup>2</sup>+WM, yielding an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.84 (95% CI 0.78–0.90) for amyloid beta and 0.82 (95% CI 0.76–0.89) for neuritic plaque, with an optimal cutoff of 0.77 for both outcomes. Reference and target region selection was more consequential for predicting amyloid beta positivity, with the WM consistently outperforming the cerebellar gray matter as a reference region for both target regions, while the PC<sup>2</sup> significantly outperformed the cortical summary region for the cerebellar gray matter reference (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.001) but only trended for significance for the WM reference (<i>P</i> = 0.069, DeLong’s test). Our findings suggest that using a WM reference and a limited cortical target region may improve PET-neuropathology correspondence, especially in older cohorts.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Amyloid quantification in the oldest-old: selecting regions for optimizing correspondence between postmortem pathology and amyloid PET

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年12月1日

查看全文
  • Jiaxin Yu,
  • Davis C. Woodworth,
  • Evan Fletcher,
  • Dana E. Greenia,
  • Syed Bukhari,
  • Thomas J. Montine,
  • Maria M. Corrada,
  • Claudia H. Kawas,
  • Charles DeCarli,
  • S. Ahmad Sajjadi,
  • Tianchen Qian

摘要

Positron emission tomography (PET) is the current gold standard for assessing amyloid burden in vivo and is often quantified using standardized uptake value ratios (SUVRs). We evaluated the performance of four SUVR calculation methods for predicting amyloid deposition at autopsy in a group of oldest-old participants. We analyzed data from 165 participants from The 90 + Study with both florbetapir PET and postmortem assessments. PET scans were re-aligned to an older age template using a custom MRI-free pipeline. SUVRs were computed from two target regions—combined posterior cingulate and precuneus (PC2) and an established cortical summary region—and two reference regions—white matter (WM) and cerebellar gray matter. Their predictive performance for amyloid beta positivity (Thal phase ≥ 3) and neuritic plaque positivity (moderate or frequent CERAD score) was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic analyses, including DeLong’s test for comparisons. Participants had a mean (± standard deviation) age at PET of 94 ± 3 years, and age at death of 97 ± 4 years. Most participants had amyloid at autopsy: 113 (68%) were amyloid beta positive, and 104 (63%) were neuritic plaque positive. The best performing SUVR was the PC2+WM, yielding an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.84 (95% CI 0.78–0.90) for amyloid beta and 0.82 (95% CI 0.76–0.89) for neuritic plaque, with an optimal cutoff of 0.77 for both outcomes. Reference and target region selection was more consequential for predicting amyloid beta positivity, with the WM consistently outperforming the cerebellar gray matter as a reference region for both target regions, while the PC2 significantly outperformed the cortical summary region for the cerebellar gray matter reference (P < 0.001) but only trended for significance for the WM reference (P = 0.069, DeLong’s test). Our findings suggest that using a WM reference and a limited cortical target region may improve PET-neuropathology correspondence, especially in older cohorts.