Scholarlink

Background <p>Species with specialised ecological niches rely heavily on specific resources or conditions, making them less resilient to habitat fragmentation and land-use changes. For specialists with limited mobility, the challenges are even greater, as they may struggle to locate new habitats for their survival. While some highly mobile species adjust their movement behaviours in human-modified environments by either avoiding areas with faster, straighter paths or adapting to forage for human-related resources, little is known about how arboreal species with low mobility adapt to urban landscapes. Koalas (<i>Phascolarctos cinereus</i>) are highly susceptible to the impacts of urbanisation due to their unique adaptations and reliance on tree canopy cover, which is thought to be a major factor driving population decline in the increasingly urbanised Australian coast.</p> Methods <p>In this study, we applied biotelemetry to track the movements of 72 koalas in urban and nonurban environments. We then applied hidden Markov models (HMMs) to these data to investigate how environmental factors (such as human land use), as well as biological factors (e.g., sex) and temporal cycles (e.g., time of day), influenced koala movement behaviours.</p> Results <p>We detected little effect of land use type on the movement behaviours of koalas in urban and nonurban landscapes, suggesting that the type of land use does not play a substantial role in how koalas shift between different movement behaviours. However, urban-dwelling koalas exhibited faster and more directed movements at night (rather than at dusk) and showed less pronounced changes in their movement behaviours across seasons than those typically observed in natural environments.</p> Conclusions <p>Our findings highlight the adaptability and flexibility of koalas in modifying their movement behaviours to navigate human-modified environments. By focusing their movements during times when human activity is lower, koalas may be able to reduce the likelihood of agonistic interactions with humans. We suggest that creating low-disturbance areas in urban and peri-urban environments could allow wildlife to maintain more natural behaviours, potentially improving their overall well-being.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Effects of urbanisation on the movements of an arboreal specialist using hidden Markov models

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年9月30日

查看全文
  • Caio Santos Neto,
  • Ross G. Dwyer,
  • Theo Michelot,
  • Romane H. Cristescu

摘要

Background

Species with specialised ecological niches rely heavily on specific resources or conditions, making them less resilient to habitat fragmentation and land-use changes. For specialists with limited mobility, the challenges are even greater, as they may struggle to locate new habitats for their survival. While some highly mobile species adjust their movement behaviours in human-modified environments by either avoiding areas with faster, straighter paths or adapting to forage for human-related resources, little is known about how arboreal species with low mobility adapt to urban landscapes. Koalas (Phascolarctos cinereus) are highly susceptible to the impacts of urbanisation due to their unique adaptations and reliance on tree canopy cover, which is thought to be a major factor driving population decline in the increasingly urbanised Australian coast.

Methods

In this study, we applied biotelemetry to track the movements of 72 koalas in urban and nonurban environments. We then applied hidden Markov models (HMMs) to these data to investigate how environmental factors (such as human land use), as well as biological factors (e.g., sex) and temporal cycles (e.g., time of day), influenced koala movement behaviours.

Results

We detected little effect of land use type on the movement behaviours of koalas in urban and nonurban landscapes, suggesting that the type of land use does not play a substantial role in how koalas shift between different movement behaviours. However, urban-dwelling koalas exhibited faster and more directed movements at night (rather than at dusk) and showed less pronounced changes in their movement behaviours across seasons than those typically observed in natural environments.

Conclusions

Our findings highlight the adaptability and flexibility of koalas in modifying their movement behaviours to navigate human-modified environments. By focusing their movements during times when human activity is lower, koalas may be able to reduce the likelihood of agonistic interactions with humans. We suggest that creating low-disturbance areas in urban and peri-urban environments could allow wildlife to maintain more natural behaviours, potentially improving their overall well-being.