Scholarlink

Background <p>Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) transformation is one of the major mechanisms of resistance to Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs). Chemotherapy is typically the recommended treatment for transformed SCLC (T-SCLC), similar to primary SCLC. However, the benefits of chemotherapy alone are minimal. Prior research highlights differences between the biological traits of T-SCLC and primary SCLC or <i>EGFR</i>-mutated lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). This study aims to elucidate the molecular characteristics of T-SCLC and identify potential treatment modalities.</p> Methods <p>We retrospectively collected tissue samples from LUAD, T-SCLC post-EGFR-TKI resistance, and primary SCLC. Genomics, transcriptomics, and proteomics were performed to clarify the differences between T-SCLC, LUAD, and primary SCLC. Hierarchical clustering analysis was then used to categorize the molecular subtype of T-SCLC, followed by a survival analysis based on these subtypes.</p> Results <p>A study involving 61 patients investigated differences between LUAD, SCLC, and primary SCLC. RNA sequencing revealed distinct gene expression variations, particularly up-regulation in <i>PPM1E</i>, <i>INSM1</i>, and <i>KCNC1</i> genes in T-SCLC. Pathway analysis linked T-SCLC to the cell cycle and neural differentiation. By conducting Hierarchical clustering analysis on RNA-seq data, the entire population can be categorized into two distinct groups. While certain T-SCLC showed similarities and differences compared to SCLC, with subtypes: LUAD-like and Non-LUAD-like. Notably, the LUAD-like subtype had significantly higher NKX2-1 expression (mean 371.8 vs. 41.8, <i>P</i> &lt; 0.0001). T-SCLC treatment approaches were categorized into matched and unmatched groups, delineated by the alignment of specific therapies with corresponding pathologies. The matched group (13 cases) exhibited a significantly prolonged median progression-free survival compared to the unmatched group (10 cases) (5.4 months vs. 3.6 months, <i>P</i> = 0.02).</p> Conclusions <p>T-SCLC exhibits marked molecular distinctiveness, setting it apart not only from LUAD but also from classical SCLC. This distinction extends to its classification into two discernible molecular subtypes: LUAD-like and Non-LUAD-like. Customizing therapeutic protocols to align with these specific subtypes have the potential to identify the most appropriate treatment for T-SCLC.</p> Graphical Abstract <p></p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Transcriptomic analysis of transformed small-cell lung cancer from EGFR-mutated lung adenocarcinoma reveals distinct subgroups and precision therapy opportunities

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年5月28日

查看全文
  • Hao Sun,
  • Chan-Yuan Zhang,
  • Xiu-Hao Zhang,
  • Zai-Xian Tai,
  • Jun-Wei Su,
  • Xiao-Cheng Lin,
  • Shi-Ling Zhang,
  • Yu-Fa Li,
  • Chao Zhang,
  • Miao Cai,
  • Xu-Chao Zhang,
  • Hua-Jun Chen,
  • Qing Zhou,
  • Yi-Long Wu,
  • Wei-Neng Feng,
  • Jin-Ji Yang

摘要

Background

Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) transformation is one of the major mechanisms of resistance to Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs). Chemotherapy is typically the recommended treatment for transformed SCLC (T-SCLC), similar to primary SCLC. However, the benefits of chemotherapy alone are minimal. Prior research highlights differences between the biological traits of T-SCLC and primary SCLC or EGFR-mutated lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). This study aims to elucidate the molecular characteristics of T-SCLC and identify potential treatment modalities.

Methods

We retrospectively collected tissue samples from LUAD, T-SCLC post-EGFR-TKI resistance, and primary SCLC. Genomics, transcriptomics, and proteomics were performed to clarify the differences between T-SCLC, LUAD, and primary SCLC. Hierarchical clustering analysis was then used to categorize the molecular subtype of T-SCLC, followed by a survival analysis based on these subtypes.

Results

A study involving 61 patients investigated differences between LUAD, SCLC, and primary SCLC. RNA sequencing revealed distinct gene expression variations, particularly up-regulation in PPM1E, INSM1, and KCNC1 genes in T-SCLC. Pathway analysis linked T-SCLC to the cell cycle and neural differentiation. By conducting Hierarchical clustering analysis on RNA-seq data, the entire population can be categorized into two distinct groups. While certain T-SCLC showed similarities and differences compared to SCLC, with subtypes: LUAD-like and Non-LUAD-like. Notably, the LUAD-like subtype had significantly higher NKX2-1 expression (mean 371.8 vs. 41.8, P < 0.0001). T-SCLC treatment approaches were categorized into matched and unmatched groups, delineated by the alignment of specific therapies with corresponding pathologies. The matched group (13 cases) exhibited a significantly prolonged median progression-free survival compared to the unmatched group (10 cases) (5.4 months vs. 3.6 months, P = 0.02).

Conclusions

T-SCLC exhibits marked molecular distinctiveness, setting it apart not only from LUAD but also from classical SCLC. This distinction extends to its classification into two discernible molecular subtypes: LUAD-like and Non-LUAD-like. Customizing therapeutic protocols to align with these specific subtypes have the potential to identify the most appropriate treatment for T-SCLC.

Graphical Abstract