Background <p>The developmental trajectory among Chinese adolescents remains unclear. This study aimed to explore the developmental trajectory of school refusal behavior and examine how individual and environmental factors predict this trajectory among Chinese adolescents.</p> Participants and methods <p>A longitudinal design was used with 1,308 middle and high school students (<i>mean</i><sub>age</sub> ± <i>SD</i><sub>age</sub> = 14.35 ± 1.50, 41.36% boys) who were followed up across three time points (T1, T2, and T3) over one year.</p> Results <p>The latent growth mixture model analysis (LGMM) revealed four subgroups within the developmental trajectory of school refusal behavior among Chinese adolescents: a low-decrease group (<i>n</i> = 678), a high-stable group (<i>n</i> = 445), a high-decrease group (<i>n</i> = 104), and a low-increase group (<i>n</i> = 81). Furthermore, group membership was predicted by academic resilience, family functioning, and class interpersonal harmony.</p> Conclusions <p>These findings suggest that effective interventions are needed to address the various developmental trajectories of school refusal behavior in adolescents.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

The developmental trajectory and influencing factors of school refusal behavior among Chinese adolescents

  • Rong-Man Yuan,
  • Na Fu

摘要

Background

The developmental trajectory among Chinese adolescents remains unclear. This study aimed to explore the developmental trajectory of school refusal behavior and examine how individual and environmental factors predict this trajectory among Chinese adolescents.

Participants and methods

A longitudinal design was used with 1,308 middle and high school students (meanage ± SDage = 14.35 ± 1.50, 41.36% boys) who were followed up across three time points (T1, T2, and T3) over one year.

Results

The latent growth mixture model analysis (LGMM) revealed four subgroups within the developmental trajectory of school refusal behavior among Chinese adolescents: a low-decrease group (n = 678), a high-stable group (n = 445), a high-decrease group (n = 104), and a low-increase group (n = 81). Furthermore, group membership was predicted by academic resilience, family functioning, and class interpersonal harmony.

Conclusions

These findings suggest that effective interventions are needed to address the various developmental trajectories of school refusal behavior in adolescents.