Scholarlink

Background <p>This study aimed to develop and validate the <i>Acculturation Discrepancy Scale for Youth of Korean Descent in Japan</i> (ADS-KJ). The scale measures youths’ subjective perceptions of intergenerational cultural gaps, that lead to parent–child acculturation discrepancies.</p> Methods <p>Based on interview data and a review of previous studies, an item pool was created and administered via questionnaire surveys to 278 youths of Korean descent in Japan and 110 Japanese youths. The scale’s structural validity, construct validity, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and criterion-related validity were examined.</p> Results <p>Consequently, it was developed as a 21-item, two-factor scale comprising <i>Identity Discrepancy</i> and <i>Values Discrepancy</i>. ADS-KJ demonstrated generally good reliability and validity, though some areas relating to its criterion-related validity need further examination.</p> Conclusion <p>As a culturally sensitive assessment tool, ADS-KJ shows potential to capture youths’ subjective perceptions of parent–child acculturation discrepancies in families of Korean descent in Japan. Thus, it can guide and support Korean descent youth in Japan’s growing immigrant society.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Development and validation of the acculturation discrepancy scale for youth of Korean descent in Japan (ADS-KJ)

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年4月9日

查看全文
  • Misa Sasaki,
  • Chiharu Maeda,
  • Tomu Ohtsuki,
  • Taisuke Katsuragawa

摘要

Background

This study aimed to develop and validate the Acculturation Discrepancy Scale for Youth of Korean Descent in Japan (ADS-KJ). The scale measures youths’ subjective perceptions of intergenerational cultural gaps, that lead to parent–child acculturation discrepancies.

Methods

Based on interview data and a review of previous studies, an item pool was created and administered via questionnaire surveys to 278 youths of Korean descent in Japan and 110 Japanese youths. The scale’s structural validity, construct validity, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and criterion-related validity were examined.

Results

Consequently, it was developed as a 21-item, two-factor scale comprising Identity Discrepancy and Values Discrepancy. ADS-KJ demonstrated generally good reliability and validity, though some areas relating to its criterion-related validity need further examination.

Conclusion

As a culturally sensitive assessment tool, ADS-KJ shows potential to capture youths’ subjective perceptions of parent–child acculturation discrepancies in families of Korean descent in Japan. Thus, it can guide and support Korean descent youth in Japan’s growing immigrant society.