Scholarlink

Background <p>The Australia &amp; New Zealand Academy for Eating Disorders (ANZAED) established a credentialing system for general practitioners (GPs) in 2024. The ANZAED Eating Disorder Credential formally recognises GPs who have the necessary knowledge and training to provide safe and effective care to patients with eating disorders (EDs). The aim of this study was to learn about the experiences of both credentialed and non-credentialed GPs, with a particular focus on their reasons for becoming credentialed, barriers to becoming credentialed, and how the Credential has impacted their clinical practice.</p> Methods <p>Thirty-eight GPs (37 female, 21 credentialed, 17 non-credentialed) completed an online mixed-methods survey, with both open-ended questions and multiple-choice questions. The survey asked about their perceptions of the Credential and their experiences with the credentialing system.</p> Results <p>The main motivations to become credentialed were to receive recognition for their training (n = 15, 71.4%) and improve their knowledge about EDs (n = 9, 42.9%). The main reasons to not become credentialed were not wanting to increase their ED caseload (n = 11, 64.7%) or be identified as an ED specific GP (n = 10, 58.8%). Three quarters (n = 16, 76.2%) of credentialed GPs did not perceive their ED patient caseload changing after becoming credentialed. Content analysis of open-ended questions yielded two themes: (1) The value of the Credential; and (2) Need for increased clarity about the Credential. Theme 1 highlighted the financial and workload barriers to becoming credentialed, whilst also indicating that GPs perceived that the Credential would improve their care of EDs. Theme 2 identified some areas where there was a need for increased understanding of the Credential’s requirements for GPs and its potential impact on people living with EDs.</p> Conclusions <p>GPs are motivated to become credentialed to gain recognition for their ED knowledge and training. However, improvements in the credentialing system may encourage its uptake. These may include increasing the Credential’s visibility and recognition, addressing perceptions of the financial impact, improving clarity about the Credential’s overall aims and providing additional support to GPs in their learning.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

General practitioner experiences and perceptions of the ANZAED Eating Disorder Credential

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年5月19日

查看全文
  • Kristy Green,
  • Phillipa Hay,
  • Janet Conti,
  • Jade Gooding,
  • Siân A. McLean,
  • Gabriella Heruc

摘要

Background

The Australia & New Zealand Academy for Eating Disorders (ANZAED) established a credentialing system for general practitioners (GPs) in 2024. The ANZAED Eating Disorder Credential formally recognises GPs who have the necessary knowledge and training to provide safe and effective care to patients with eating disorders (EDs). The aim of this study was to learn about the experiences of both credentialed and non-credentialed GPs, with a particular focus on their reasons for becoming credentialed, barriers to becoming credentialed, and how the Credential has impacted their clinical practice.

Methods

Thirty-eight GPs (37 female, 21 credentialed, 17 non-credentialed) completed an online mixed-methods survey, with both open-ended questions and multiple-choice questions. The survey asked about their perceptions of the Credential and their experiences with the credentialing system.

Results

The main motivations to become credentialed were to receive recognition for their training (n = 15, 71.4%) and improve their knowledge about EDs (n = 9, 42.9%). The main reasons to not become credentialed were not wanting to increase their ED caseload (n = 11, 64.7%) or be identified as an ED specific GP (n = 10, 58.8%). Three quarters (n = 16, 76.2%) of credentialed GPs did not perceive their ED patient caseload changing after becoming credentialed. Content analysis of open-ended questions yielded two themes: (1) The value of the Credential; and (2) Need for increased clarity about the Credential. Theme 1 highlighted the financial and workload barriers to becoming credentialed, whilst also indicating that GPs perceived that the Credential would improve their care of EDs. Theme 2 identified some areas where there was a need for increased understanding of the Credential’s requirements for GPs and its potential impact on people living with EDs.

Conclusions

GPs are motivated to become credentialed to gain recognition for their ED knowledge and training. However, improvements in the credentialing system may encourage its uptake. These may include increasing the Credential’s visibility and recognition, addressing perceptions of the financial impact, improving clarity about the Credential’s overall aims and providing additional support to GPs in their learning.