Scholarlink

Background <p>Affect regulation models suggest high negative and low positive affect may drive binge eating and purging in bulimia nervosa (BN). While ecological momentary assessment (EMA) studies often support these theories, inconsistent outcomes in affect-targeted interventions suggest causal relations vary across individuals. This study applied causal discovery analysis (CDA) to EMA data to characterize such heterogeneity in person-specific causal models for BN.</p> Methods <p>EMA data from 118 adult women with BN, collected over 14 days, assessed momentary negative affect, positive affect, binge eating, and self-induced vomiting. Using the Greedy Fast Causal Inference algorithm, we derived individual causal models and estimated effect sizes via structural equation modeling. Heterogeneity was evaluated by the proportion of participants with affect as a causal factor for BN behaviors.</p> Results <p>Causal patterns were highly heterogeneous. Elevated negative affect was causal for binge eating in 16.9% of participants, vomiting in 18.6%, and either behavior in 27.1%. Low positive affect was causal for binge eating in 8.5%, vomiting in 11.0%, and either behavior in 15.3%. Behavior–behavior causality was also common: vomiting caused binge eating in 26.3% of participants, and binge eating caused vomiting in 22.0%.</p> Conclusions <p>CDA revealed marked heterogeneity in causal factors underlying BN behaviors, with some models showing affect-driven behaviors and others indicating behavior-driven patterns. Ultimately, this work indicates that the link between momentary affect and BN behaviors is highly individualized, underscoring the need for precision-targeted interventions rather than one-size-fits-all treatments.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Personal causal modeling of affect and eating behaviors in bulimia nervosa: implications for personalized treatment

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年1月23日

查看全文
  • Kelvin O. Lim,
  • Erich Kummerfeld,
  • Lisa M. Anderson,
  • Stephen A. Wonderlich,
  • Scott Engel,
  • Ross D. Crosby,
  • Carol B. Peterson

摘要

Background

Affect regulation models suggest high negative and low positive affect may drive binge eating and purging in bulimia nervosa (BN). While ecological momentary assessment (EMA) studies often support these theories, inconsistent outcomes in affect-targeted interventions suggest causal relations vary across individuals. This study applied causal discovery analysis (CDA) to EMA data to characterize such heterogeneity in person-specific causal models for BN.

Methods

EMA data from 118 adult women with BN, collected over 14 days, assessed momentary negative affect, positive affect, binge eating, and self-induced vomiting. Using the Greedy Fast Causal Inference algorithm, we derived individual causal models and estimated effect sizes via structural equation modeling. Heterogeneity was evaluated by the proportion of participants with affect as a causal factor for BN behaviors.

Results

Causal patterns were highly heterogeneous. Elevated negative affect was causal for binge eating in 16.9% of participants, vomiting in 18.6%, and either behavior in 27.1%. Low positive affect was causal for binge eating in 8.5%, vomiting in 11.0%, and either behavior in 15.3%. Behavior–behavior causality was also common: vomiting caused binge eating in 26.3% of participants, and binge eating caused vomiting in 22.0%.

Conclusions

CDA revealed marked heterogeneity in causal factors underlying BN behaviors, with some models showing affect-driven behaviors and others indicating behavior-driven patterns. Ultimately, this work indicates that the link between momentary affect and BN behaviors is highly individualized, underscoring the need for precision-targeted interventions rather than one-size-fits-all treatments.