Scholarlink

<p>This Correspondence article provides a lived experience perspective on McColl et al.‘s study, which examines the use of Dialectical Behaviour Therapy for individuals with eating disorders. Drawing on experiences of DBT treatment for longstanding and severe anorexia, the author critically engages with the study’s findings, highlighting both the strengths and limitations of the treatment approach McColl et al. describe. While DBT has shown promise in addressing the emotional dysregulation and distress tolerance that underlie many eating disorder behaviours, the author emphasises the need for further adaptation to cater to the complexities of co-occurring physical, psychological, and neurodivergent conditions. The benefits of DBT for eating disorders are explored through personal reflections which emphasise the value and importance of skill-development, therapeutic validation, and motivation to build a “life worth living”. Additional, co-produced research is required to further develop the evidence for DBT-based approaches, with particular attention needed in addressing language, stigma, cultural biases, and exclusionary research and clinical practices. Writing from a UK context, the author ends by advocating for the reinstatement of DBT within national guidelines for eating disorder treatment, highlighting its transdiagnostic relevance and potential to provide comprehensive, holistic support for those with more complex presentations.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Furthering the benefits of DBT for eating disorders: a lived experience correspondence on McColl et al.

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年2月20日

查看全文
  • James Downs

摘要

This Correspondence article provides a lived experience perspective on McColl et al.‘s study, which examines the use of Dialectical Behaviour Therapy for individuals with eating disorders. Drawing on experiences of DBT treatment for longstanding and severe anorexia, the author critically engages with the study’s findings, highlighting both the strengths and limitations of the treatment approach McColl et al. describe. While DBT has shown promise in addressing the emotional dysregulation and distress tolerance that underlie many eating disorder behaviours, the author emphasises the need for further adaptation to cater to the complexities of co-occurring physical, psychological, and neurodivergent conditions. The benefits of DBT for eating disorders are explored through personal reflections which emphasise the value and importance of skill-development, therapeutic validation, and motivation to build a “life worth living”. Additional, co-produced research is required to further develop the evidence for DBT-based approaches, with particular attention needed in addressing language, stigma, cultural biases, and exclusionary research and clinical practices. Writing from a UK context, the author ends by advocating for the reinstatement of DBT within national guidelines for eating disorder treatment, highlighting its transdiagnostic relevance and potential to provide comprehensive, holistic support for those with more complex presentations.