Background <p>Rooted in long-standing assumptions and adapted from classifications mainly used for Latin American cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL), the nationally recommended clinical categories in Ethiopia for CL remain limited to localized cutaneous leishmaniasis (LCL), mucocutaneous leishmaniasis (MCL), and diffuse cutaneous leishmaniasis (DCL). However, these categories are associated with immune mechanisms which have not been validated in the Ethiopian context and thus risk misrepresenting the true clinical and immunopathological diversity. In this opinion piece, we will therefore outline key knowledge gaps and challenges in current clinico-immunological research on Ethiopian CL.</p> Main body <p>In Ethiopia, <i>Leishmania aethiopica</i> is often assumed as the causative agent of these ‘LCL’, ‘MCL’ and ‘DCL’ forms, yet significant gaps in knowledge urge caution. For example, adoption of this ‘LCL’, ‘MCL’ and ‘DCL’ terminology and the associated immune mechanisms has led to inconsistent results. Most immunological studies on Ethiopian CL have focused on peripheral blood, resulting in little information about immune processes in the lesion, the original site of infection. Adding to the complexity, other species (including <i>L. major</i>, <i>L. donovani</i> and <i>L. tropica</i> as well as <i>L. aethiopica</i> hybrids) also circulate, with reports of <i>Leishmania</i> RNA virus co-infection. To address these challenges, we propose a multidimensional approach that combines standardized clinical documentation with appropriate lesion and blood sampling for in-depth profiling of both immune responses and parasite diversity. Adopting this holistic approach will require inclusive (inter)national collaborations with a focus on promoting equitable biobank and data sharing which will strengthen local research capacities.</p> Conclusions <p>By addressing the main challenges and knowledge gaps in current clinico-immunological research through a multidimensional approach, this opinion aims to provide the tools to achieve a better and unbiased understanding of the immunopathogenesis of Ethiopian CL, a severe yet under-investigated disease. Such progress is essential for improving CL management in Ethiopia and aligns with the World Health Organization priority on controlling CL.</p> Graphical Abstract <p></p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

From dogma to data: charting a path forward for clinico-immunological research in Ethiopian cutaneous leishmaniasis

  • Thao-Thy Pham,
  • Saskia van Henten,
  • Mikias Woldetensay,
  • Mezgebu Silamsaw Asres,
  • Eleni Ayele,
  • Paul M. Kaye,
  • Malgorzata Anna Domagalska,
  • Jean-Claude Dujardin,
  • Johan van Griensven,
  • Wim Adriaensen,
  • Mezgebu Silamsaw Asres,
  • Eleni Ayele,
  • Helina Fikre,
  • Yonael Mulat,
  • Tigist Mekonnen,
  • Mekibib Kassa,
  • Tadfe Bogale,
  • Asnakew Engidaw Mereed,
  • Tadele Mulaw,
  • Roma Melkamu,
  • Arega Yeshanew,
  • Aman Mossa,
  • Zemeney Mulugeta,
  • Dilargachew Dessie Dawit,
  • Aschalew Tamiru,
  • Desalegn Adane,
  • Saba Atnafu,
  • Jemal Yasin,
  • Abiy Ayele Angelo,
  • Yetemwork Aleka,
  • Hana Yohannes,
  • Helen Terefe,
  • Mikias Woldetensay,
  • Abebe Sinknew Seid,
  • Mesfin Malede Nigussie,
  • Anemut Leykun Ayele,
  • Beza Tesfalem,
  • Tesfaye Ketema,
  • Mengistu Tilaye Belay,
  • Seidu Biresaw,
  • Getachew Yenus Aman,
  • Paul Kaye,
  • Nidhi Sharma Dey,
  • Shoumit Dey,
  • Ron Heeren,
  • Benjamin Baluff,
  • Isabeau Vermeulen,
  • Jianhua Cao,
  • Filip Thiessen,
  • Jean-Claude Dujardin,
  • Malgorzata Anna Domagalska,
  • Kaoutar Choukri,
  • Pieter Monsieurs,
  • Johan van Griensven,
  • Saskia van Henten,
  • Myrthe Pareyn,
  • Wim Adriaensen,
  • Thao-Thy Pham,
  • Nicky de Vrij,
  • Anke Van Hul

摘要

Background

Rooted in long-standing assumptions and adapted from classifications mainly used for Latin American cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL), the nationally recommended clinical categories in Ethiopia for CL remain limited to localized cutaneous leishmaniasis (LCL), mucocutaneous leishmaniasis (MCL), and diffuse cutaneous leishmaniasis (DCL). However, these categories are associated with immune mechanisms which have not been validated in the Ethiopian context and thus risk misrepresenting the true clinical and immunopathological diversity. In this opinion piece, we will therefore outline key knowledge gaps and challenges in current clinico-immunological research on Ethiopian CL.

Main body

In Ethiopia, Leishmania aethiopica is often assumed as the causative agent of these ‘LCL’, ‘MCL’ and ‘DCL’ forms, yet significant gaps in knowledge urge caution. For example, adoption of this ‘LCL’, ‘MCL’ and ‘DCL’ terminology and the associated immune mechanisms has led to inconsistent results. Most immunological studies on Ethiopian CL have focused on peripheral blood, resulting in little information about immune processes in the lesion, the original site of infection. Adding to the complexity, other species (including L. major, L. donovani and L. tropica as well as L. aethiopica hybrids) also circulate, with reports of Leishmania RNA virus co-infection. To address these challenges, we propose a multidimensional approach that combines standardized clinical documentation with appropriate lesion and blood sampling for in-depth profiling of both immune responses and parasite diversity. Adopting this holistic approach will require inclusive (inter)national collaborations with a focus on promoting equitable biobank and data sharing which will strengthen local research capacities.

Conclusions

By addressing the main challenges and knowledge gaps in current clinico-immunological research through a multidimensional approach, this opinion aims to provide the tools to achieve a better and unbiased understanding of the immunopathogenesis of Ethiopian CL, a severe yet under-investigated disease. Such progress is essential for improving CL management in Ethiopia and aligns with the World Health Organization priority on controlling CL.

Graphical Abstract