Scholarlink

<p>This article discusses the value of integrating spatial crime analysis with local stakeholder engagement to fully leverage opportunity theory in community crime prevention. We begin by describing the literature on opportunity theory applications and the limitations of that research, noting both the value and rarity of employing inclusive research practices. To quantify the frequency, types, and trends in stakeholder engagement employed in opportunity theory-based studies, we conducted a content analysis of Crime Science articles published from 2012 through 2025. Of the 212 eligible studies reviewed, 12.3% involved a mix of quantitative and qualitative methodologies, 13.7% incorporated some degree of stakeholder perspectives, yet only 1.9% specifically included community members residing in the geographic areas under study. We then present three case studies on gun violence, auto thefts, and street robberies in Newark, New Jersey through the Newark Public Safety Collaborative, an anchor initiative housed in Rutgers University’s School of Criminal Justice. The case studies illustrate how data analysis alone pointed to opportunity-reducing strategies that would have been less effective or misguided without community member input. This paper concludes by advocating for the field of crime science to employ more comprehensive, triangulated methodologies that combine spatial analysis with the lived experience of community members as well as the professional expertise of other essential stakeholders.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Widening the aperture of the opportunity lens: engaging local stakeholders in the interpretation of crime concentrations

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年5月29日

查看全文
  • Nancy La Vigne,
  • Alejandro Giménez-Santana,
  • Gaspard Tissandier,
  • Adriana Santos

摘要

This article discusses the value of integrating spatial crime analysis with local stakeholder engagement to fully leverage opportunity theory in community crime prevention. We begin by describing the literature on opportunity theory applications and the limitations of that research, noting both the value and rarity of employing inclusive research practices. To quantify the frequency, types, and trends in stakeholder engagement employed in opportunity theory-based studies, we conducted a content analysis of Crime Science articles published from 2012 through 2025. Of the 212 eligible studies reviewed, 12.3% involved a mix of quantitative and qualitative methodologies, 13.7% incorporated some degree of stakeholder perspectives, yet only 1.9% specifically included community members residing in the geographic areas under study. We then present three case studies on gun violence, auto thefts, and street robberies in Newark, New Jersey through the Newark Public Safety Collaborative, an anchor initiative housed in Rutgers University’s School of Criminal Justice. The case studies illustrate how data analysis alone pointed to opportunity-reducing strategies that would have been less effective or misguided without community member input. This paper concludes by advocating for the field of crime science to employ more comprehensive, triangulated methodologies that combine spatial analysis with the lived experience of community members as well as the professional expertise of other essential stakeholders.