<p>A lack of a widely accepted laboratory procedure for determining concrete shear strength remains a significant obstacle to consistent comparison of experimental results and calibration of analytical models. Unlike established shear setups, the proposed method uses controlled boundary conditions and a simple specimen to minimise parasitic effects and promote a shear-dominated response. This paper presents a novel experimental setup for evaluating the Mode&#xa0;II (in-plane shear, sliding along a crack plane) shear strength of plain high-strength concrete, and establishes the baseline response, validity, and sensitivity of the setup. An experimental programme was conducted on six plain high-strength concrete mixtures (compressive strength <InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(f_c \approx 60\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <msub> <mi>f</mi> <mi>c</mi> </msub> <mo>≈</mo> <mn>60</mn> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>–80&#xa0;MPa) to isolate mix-design effects through controlled variations in mixture parameters. Mixtures were tested under four distinct loading configurations: fully compressed, partial compression, mixed-mode compression, and shear-dominated, to capture the transition from measuring compressive strength to shear strength. Complementary finite-element simulations in ATENA were conducted to investigate how each configuration influences the stress state and to verify the experimentally observed failure modes. Pearson correlation coefficients between configuration-specific peak stresses indicate that the shear-dominated configuration shows weak-to-moderate coupling with the other configurations (<InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(r=0.17\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>r</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.17</mn> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> with fully compressed; <InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(r=0.41\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>r</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.41</mn> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> with partial compression; <InlineEquation ID="IEq4"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(r=0.36\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>r</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.36</mn> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> with mixed-mode compression), supporting that its peak response is comparatively distinct from the compression-governed regimes. Comparison with selected shear-strength estimation models based on different setups yielded close agreement in the investigated strength range, with most points for the best-performing models lying within the ±15% band and mean absolute error (MAE) values of 0.48–1.21&#xa0;MPa. Both correlation analysis and analytical comparison support the hypothesis that the proposed setup provides a reliable and practical baseline for isolating shear-dominated response, enabling improved comparison between studies and supporting future standardisation of shear strength testing in concrete.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

A Novel A–A Shear-Test Setup

  • Ayman G. Abeidi,
  • Salem G. Nehme

摘要

A lack of a widely accepted laboratory procedure for determining concrete shear strength remains a significant obstacle to consistent comparison of experimental results and calibration of analytical models. Unlike established shear setups, the proposed method uses controlled boundary conditions and a simple specimen to minimise parasitic effects and promote a shear-dominated response. This paper presents a novel experimental setup for evaluating the Mode II (in-plane shear, sliding along a crack plane) shear strength of plain high-strength concrete, and establishes the baseline response, validity, and sensitivity of the setup. An experimental programme was conducted on six plain high-strength concrete mixtures (compressive strength \(f_c \approx 60\) f c 60 –80 MPa) to isolate mix-design effects through controlled variations in mixture parameters. Mixtures were tested under four distinct loading configurations: fully compressed, partial compression, mixed-mode compression, and shear-dominated, to capture the transition from measuring compressive strength to shear strength. Complementary finite-element simulations in ATENA were conducted to investigate how each configuration influences the stress state and to verify the experimentally observed failure modes. Pearson correlation coefficients between configuration-specific peak stresses indicate that the shear-dominated configuration shows weak-to-moderate coupling with the other configurations ( \(r=0.17\) r = 0.17 with fully compressed; \(r=0.41\) r = 0.41 with partial compression; \(r=0.36\) r = 0.36 with mixed-mode compression), supporting that its peak response is comparatively distinct from the compression-governed regimes. Comparison with selected shear-strength estimation models based on different setups yielded close agreement in the investigated strength range, with most points for the best-performing models lying within the ±15% band and mean absolute error (MAE) values of 0.48–1.21 MPa. Both correlation analysis and analytical comparison support the hypothesis that the proposed setup provides a reliable and practical baseline for isolating shear-dominated response, enabling improved comparison between studies and supporting future standardisation of shear strength testing in concrete.