Scholarlink

Background <p>Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) remains challenging to diagnose due to the absence of overt systolic dysfunction. Left atrial reservoir strain (LARS) has emerged as a sensitive marker of left atrial dysfunction, yet its clinical application is constrained by measurement variability and time demands. We investigated the diagnostic performance of automated deep learning (DL)-derived LARS for early HFpEF identification.</p> Methods <p>This retrospective observational study enrolled 200 patients (107 HFpEF, 93 controls) who underwent transthoracic echocardiography. HFpEF was diagnosed per 2021 ESC guidelines. All echocardiographic datasets were analyzed using a validated DL-based automated platform (EchoGo Pro, Ultromics). Agreement between DL-derived and manually measured parameters was evaluated by Pearson correlation and Bland–Altman analysis. Diagnostic performance was assessed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, and independent predictors of HFpEF were identified via multivariate logistic regression.</p> Results <p>DL-derived LARS was significantly lower in HFpEF patients compared to controls (19.3 ± 5.7% vs. 30.8 ± 6.4%, <i>P</i> &lt; 0.001). Strong agreement was demonstrated between DL-derived and manually measured LARS (r = 0.911; mean bias − 0.67 ± 2.34%), with superior reproducibility of the automated approach (ICC = 0.974). DL-derived LARS achieved an AUC of 0.806 (95% CI 0.748–0.864), sensitivity of 81.3%, and specificity of 83.9% at a cutoff of 24.2%, comparable to manually derived LARS (AUC = 0.818, <i>P</i> = 0.631) and numerically higher than LAVI and E/e' ratio, although these pairwise differences did not reach statistical significance. On multivariate analysis, DL-derived LARS was the strongest independent echocardiographic predictor of HFpEF (adjusted OR = 0.74, 95% CI 0.65–0.84, <i>P</i> &lt; 0.001).</p> Conclusions <p>Automated DL-based LARS analysis provides accurate, reproducible, and time-efficient quantification comparable to expert manual measurement, demonstrating robust diagnostic value for early HFpEF identification.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Clinical value of automated left atrial strain analysis based on deep learning algorithms in echocardiography for early diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年7月1日

查看全文
  • Libo Wang,
  • Haiyang Mu,
  • Ye Tian,
  • Ying Lin,
  • Jian Wang,
  • Liye Zhang,
  • Xingying Wu,
  • Mei Chen,
  • Meiling Yan,
  • Chaofei Zhou

摘要

Background

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) remains challenging to diagnose due to the absence of overt systolic dysfunction. Left atrial reservoir strain (LARS) has emerged as a sensitive marker of left atrial dysfunction, yet its clinical application is constrained by measurement variability and time demands. We investigated the diagnostic performance of automated deep learning (DL)-derived LARS for early HFpEF identification.

Methods

This retrospective observational study enrolled 200 patients (107 HFpEF, 93 controls) who underwent transthoracic echocardiography. HFpEF was diagnosed per 2021 ESC guidelines. All echocardiographic datasets were analyzed using a validated DL-based automated platform (EchoGo Pro, Ultromics). Agreement between DL-derived and manually measured parameters was evaluated by Pearson correlation and Bland–Altman analysis. Diagnostic performance was assessed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, and independent predictors of HFpEF were identified via multivariate logistic regression.

Results

DL-derived LARS was significantly lower in HFpEF patients compared to controls (19.3 ± 5.7% vs. 30.8 ± 6.4%, P < 0.001). Strong agreement was demonstrated between DL-derived and manually measured LARS (r = 0.911; mean bias − 0.67 ± 2.34%), with superior reproducibility of the automated approach (ICC = 0.974). DL-derived LARS achieved an AUC of 0.806 (95% CI 0.748–0.864), sensitivity of 81.3%, and specificity of 83.9% at a cutoff of 24.2%, comparable to manually derived LARS (AUC = 0.818, P = 0.631) and numerically higher than LAVI and E/e' ratio, although these pairwise differences did not reach statistical significance. On multivariate analysis, DL-derived LARS was the strongest independent echocardiographic predictor of HFpEF (adjusted OR = 0.74, 95% CI 0.65–0.84, P < 0.001).

Conclusions

Automated DL-based LARS analysis provides accurate, reproducible, and time-efficient quantification comparable to expert manual measurement, demonstrating robust diagnostic value for early HFpEF identification.