Scholarlink

<p>Cybersecurity has evolved from a purely technological issue to a complex one involving law, ethics, and governance due to the fact that the rapid digital transition has exposed unprecedented vulnerabilities inside cloud computing, artificial intelligence (AI), and Internet of Things (IoT) ecosystems. The Global Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), and the Network and Information Security (NIS) Directive are all part of the international regulatory frameworks that are compared in this study, which is titled “Cybersecurity Laws, Digital Crimes, and Ethical Considerations: A Multidimensional Perspective on Cyber Risk Regulation (MPoCRR).” The study methodically organizes the comparison using secondary sources and a qualitative technique, utilizing structured matrices to assess enforcement capability, ethical sensitivity, and legislative scope. Cybercrime is defined differently in different jurisdictions, and enforcement procedures and the incorporation of ethics into digital policy also differ significantly, according to the results. In contrast to European frameworks, American regulations show more sectoral specialization and less cohesive cross-border data governance and are less ethically sensitive. According to the research, it is becoming more difficult to adhere to conventional norms of transparency, privacy, and equity in the face of new technological developments such as algorithmic bias and AI-driven spying. The study concludes that the present cybersecurity regulations are ineffective in dealing with the increasingly globalized and AI-enhanced threat landscape because they are reactive and fragmented. Integrating ethical AI norms with data protection principles and legal compliance, it proposes a uniform global cybersecurity governance structure. To bridge the gap between digital risk management and ethics, lawmakers might use the MPoCRR model as a guide. This model puts an emphasis on cyber governance that is flexible, open, and guided by ethics.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Cybersecurity laws, digital crimes, and ethical considerations: a multidimensional perspective on Cyber Risk Regulation (MPoCRR)

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年6月29日

查看全文
  • Jafar Ababneh,
  • Abdulmajeed Alzara,
  • Hani Attar,
  • Ala’a Al-Shaikh,
  • Amer Abu-Jassar,
  • Mohamed Hafez

摘要

Cybersecurity has evolved from a purely technological issue to a complex one involving law, ethics, and governance due to the fact that the rapid digital transition has exposed unprecedented vulnerabilities inside cloud computing, artificial intelligence (AI), and Internet of Things (IoT) ecosystems. The Global Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), and the Network and Information Security (NIS) Directive are all part of the international regulatory frameworks that are compared in this study, which is titled “Cybersecurity Laws, Digital Crimes, and Ethical Considerations: A Multidimensional Perspective on Cyber Risk Regulation (MPoCRR).” The study methodically organizes the comparison using secondary sources and a qualitative technique, utilizing structured matrices to assess enforcement capability, ethical sensitivity, and legislative scope. Cybercrime is defined differently in different jurisdictions, and enforcement procedures and the incorporation of ethics into digital policy also differ significantly, according to the results. In contrast to European frameworks, American regulations show more sectoral specialization and less cohesive cross-border data governance and are less ethically sensitive. According to the research, it is becoming more difficult to adhere to conventional norms of transparency, privacy, and equity in the face of new technological developments such as algorithmic bias and AI-driven spying. The study concludes that the present cybersecurity regulations are ineffective in dealing with the increasingly globalized and AI-enhanced threat landscape because they are reactive and fragmented. Integrating ethical AI norms with data protection principles and legal compliance, it proposes a uniform global cybersecurity governance structure. To bridge the gap between digital risk management and ethics, lawmakers might use the MPoCRR model as a guide. This model puts an emphasis on cyber governance that is flexible, open, and guided by ethics.