<p>In this paper, we investigate the existence of weak solutions for a class of double phase Kirchhoff elliptic problems under Neumann boundary conditions. The problem is characterized by the equation <Equation ID="Equa"> <MediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="13661_2025_2043_Article_Equa.gif" Format="GIF" Height="105" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="578" /> </MediaObject> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mo>{</mo> <mtable columnalign="left left" columnspacing="1em"> <mtr> <mtd> <mo>−</mo> <msub> <mi>K</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> <mrow> <mo>(</mo> <msub> <mo>∫</mo> <mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</mi> </msub> <mi>A</mi> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>y</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mi mathvariant="normal">∇</mi> <mi>ζ</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> <mi mathvariant="normal">d</mi> <mi>y</mi> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> <mo>div</mo> <mi>a</mi> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>y</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mi mathvariant="normal">∇</mi> <mi>ζ</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> <mo>−</mo> <msub> <mi>K</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msub> <mrow> <mo>(</mo> <msub> <mo>∫</mo> <mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</mi> </msub> <mi>B</mi> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>y</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mi mathvariant="normal">∇</mi> <mi>ζ</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> <mi mathvariant="normal">d</mi> <mi>y</mi> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> <mo>div</mo> <mi>b</mi> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>y</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mi mathvariant="normal">∇</mi> <mi>ζ</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mtd> </mtr> <mtr> <mtd> <mo>+</mo> <msub> <mi>K</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> <mrow> <mo>(</mo> <msub> <mo>∫</mo> <mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</mi> </msub> <mfrac> <mn>1</mn> <mrow> <msub> <mi>ν</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>y</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </mfrac> <mo stretchy="false">|</mo> <mi>ζ</mi> <msup> <mo stretchy="false">|</mo> <mrow> <msub> <mi>ν</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>y</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </msup> <mi mathvariant="normal">d</mi> <mi>y</mi> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> <mo stretchy="false">|</mo> <mi>ζ</mi> <msup> <mo stretchy="false">|</mo> <mrow> <msub> <mi>ν</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>y</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> <mo>−</mo> <mn>2</mn> </mrow> </msup> <mi>ζ</mi> </mtd> </mtr> <mtr> <mtd> <mspace width="1em" /> <mo>+</mo> <msub> <mi>K</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msub> <mrow> <mo>(</mo> <msub> <mo>∫</mo> <mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</mi> </msub> <mfrac> <mn>1</mn> <mrow> <msub> <mi>ν</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msub> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>y</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </mfrac> <mo stretchy="false">|</mo> <mi>ζ</mi> <msup> <mo stretchy="false">|</mo> <mrow> <msub> <mi>ν</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msub> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>y</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </msup> <mi mathvariant="normal">d</mi> <mi>y</mi> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> <mo stretchy="false">|</mo> <mi>ζ</mi> <msup> <mo stretchy="false">|</mo> <mrow> <msub> <mi>ν</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msub> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>y</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> <mo>−</mo> <mn>2</mn> </mrow> </msup> <mi>ζ</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mi>θ</mi> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>y</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mi>ζ</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mtd> <mtd> <mtext>in&#xa0;</mtext> <mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</mi> </mtd> </mtr> <mtr> <mtd> <mi>a</mi> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>y</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mi mathvariant="normal">∇</mi> <mi>ζ</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> <mo>⋅</mo> <mover accent="true"> <mi>n</mi> <mo stretchy="false">→</mo> </mover> <mo>=</mo> <mi>b</mi> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>y</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mi mathvariant="normal">∇</mi> <mi>ζ</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> <mo>⋅</mo> <mover accent="true"> <mi>n</mi> <mo stretchy="false">→</mo> </mover> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0</mn> <mo>,</mo> </mtd> <mtd> <mtext>on&#xa0;</mtext> <mi>∂</mi> <mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</mi> <mo>,</mo> </mtd> </mtr> </mtable> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\( \left \{ \textstyle\begin{array}{l@{\quad}l} -K_{1}\left (\int _{\Lambda} A(y, \nabla \zeta ) \mathrm{d} y\right ) \operatorname{div} a(y, \nabla \zeta ) -K_{2}\left (\int _{\Lambda} B(y, \nabla \zeta ) \mathrm{d} y\right ) \operatorname{div} b(y, \nabla \zeta ) \\ +K_{1}\left (\int _{\Lambda} \frac{1}{\nu _{1}(y)}| \zeta |^{\nu _{1}(y)} \mathrm{d} y\right )| \zeta |^{\nu _{1}(y)-2} \zeta \\ \quad{} +K_{2}\left ( \int _{\Lambda} \frac{1}{\nu _{2}(y)}| \zeta |^{\nu _{2}(y)} \mathrm{d} y\right )| \zeta |^{\nu _{2}(y)-2} \zeta =\theta (y, \zeta ) &amp;\text{in } \Lambda \\ a(y, \nabla \zeta )\cdot \vec{n}=b(y, \nabla \zeta )\cdot \vec{n}=0, &amp; \text{on } \partial \Lambda ,\end{array}\displaystyle \right . \)</EquationSource> </Equation> where <InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="13661_2025_2043_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="16" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="22" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi>K</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> </math></EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="TEX">$K_{1} $</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> and <InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="13661_2025_2043_Article_IEq2.gif" Format="GIF" Height="16" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="22" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi>K</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msub> </math></EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="TEX">$K_{2} $</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> are Kirchhoff-type functions, and the nonlinearities <InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="13661_2025_2043_Article_IEq3.gif" Format="GIF" Height="19" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="66" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi>A</mi> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>y</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mi mathvariant="normal">∇</mi> <mi>ζ</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </math></EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="TEX">$A(y, \nabla \zeta ) $</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> and <InlineEquation ID="IEq4"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="13661_2025_2043_Article_IEq4.gif" Format="GIF" Height="19" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="67" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi>B</mi> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>y</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mi mathvariant="normal">∇</mi> <mi>ζ</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </math></EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="TEX">$B(y, \nabla \zeta ) $</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> exhibit double phase behavior. Employing a theorem proposed by B. Ricceri, which extends a more general variational principle, we confirm the existence of countless weak solutions for this complex system. Additionally, we present examples that illustrate the applicability of the theoretical results to specific cases. The findings contribute to the broader understanding of non-standard growth conditions and their implications in the study of Kirchhoff-type elliptic problems.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Multiplicity of weak solutions in double phase Kirchhoff elliptic problems with Neumann conditions

  • Ahmed Ahmed,
  • Mohamed Saad Bouh Elemine Vall,
  • Salah Boulaaras

摘要

In this paper, we investigate the existence of weak solutions for a class of double phase Kirchhoff elliptic problems under Neumann boundary conditions. The problem is characterized by the equation { K 1 ( Λ A ( y , ζ ) d y ) div a ( y , ζ ) K 2 ( Λ B ( y , ζ ) d y ) div b ( y , ζ ) + K 1 ( Λ 1 ν 1 ( y ) | ζ | ν 1 ( y ) d y ) | ζ | ν 1 ( y ) 2 ζ + K 2 ( Λ 1 ν 2 ( y ) | ζ | ν 2 ( y ) d y ) | ζ | ν 2 ( y ) 2 ζ = θ ( y , ζ ) in  Λ a ( y , ζ ) n = b ( y , ζ ) n = 0 , on  Λ , \( \left \{ \textstyle\begin{array}{l@{\quad}l} -K_{1}\left (\int _{\Lambda} A(y, \nabla \zeta ) \mathrm{d} y\right ) \operatorname{div} a(y, \nabla \zeta ) -K_{2}\left (\int _{\Lambda} B(y, \nabla \zeta ) \mathrm{d} y\right ) \operatorname{div} b(y, \nabla \zeta ) \\ +K_{1}\left (\int _{\Lambda} \frac{1}{\nu _{1}(y)}| \zeta |^{\nu _{1}(y)} \mathrm{d} y\right )| \zeta |^{\nu _{1}(y)-2} \zeta \\ \quad{} +K_{2}\left ( \int _{\Lambda} \frac{1}{\nu _{2}(y)}| \zeta |^{\nu _{2}(y)} \mathrm{d} y\right )| \zeta |^{\nu _{2}(y)-2} \zeta =\theta (y, \zeta ) &\text{in } \Lambda \\ a(y, \nabla \zeta )\cdot \vec{n}=b(y, \nabla \zeta )\cdot \vec{n}=0, & \text{on } \partial \Lambda ,\end{array}\displaystyle \right . \) where K 1 $K_{1} $ and K 2 $K_{2} $ are Kirchhoff-type functions, and the nonlinearities A ( y , ζ ) $A(y, \nabla \zeta ) $ and B ( y , ζ ) $B(y, \nabla \zeta ) $ exhibit double phase behavior. Employing a theorem proposed by B. Ricceri, which extends a more general variational principle, we confirm the existence of countless weak solutions for this complex system. Additionally, we present examples that illustrate the applicability of the theoretical results to specific cases. The findings contribute to the broader understanding of non-standard growth conditions and their implications in the study of Kirchhoff-type elliptic problems.