<p>Let <InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="13660_2025_3354_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="20" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="106" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi>A</mi> <mo>=</mo> <msub> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <msub> <mi>a</mi> <mrow> <mi>n</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mi>k</mi> </mrow> </msub> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>n</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mi>k</mi> <mo>≥</mo> <mn>0</mn> </mrow> </msub> </math></EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="TEX">$A=(a_{n,k})_{n,k\geq 0}$</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> be a non-negative matrix. Denote by <InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="13660_2025_3354_Article_IEq2.gif" Format="GIF" Height="20" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="44" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi>L</mi> <mi>p</mi> </msub> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>A</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </math></EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="TEX">$L_{p}(A)$</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, the supremum of those&#xa0;<i>ℓ</i>, satisfying the following inequality <Equation ID="Equa"> <MediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="13660_2025_3354_Article_Equa.gif" Format="GIF" Height="61" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="413" /> </MediaObject> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msup> <mrow> <mo>(</mo> <munderover> <mo movablelimits="false">∑</mo> <mrow> <mi>n</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0</mn> </mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">∞</mi> </munderover> <msup> <mrow> <mo>(</mo> <munderover> <mo movablelimits="false">∑</mo> <mrow> <mi>k</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0</mn> </mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">∞</mi> </munderover> <msub> <mi>a</mi> <mrow> <mi>n</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mi>k</mi> </mrow> </msub> <msub> <mi>x</mi> <mi>k</mi> </msub> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> <mi>p</mi> </msup> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> <mfrac> <mn>1</mn> <mi>p</mi> </mfrac> </msup> <mo>≥</mo> <mi>ℓ</mi> <msup> <mrow> <mo>(</mo> <munderover> <mo movablelimits="false">∑</mo> <mrow> <mi>k</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0</mn> </mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">∞</mi> </munderover> <msubsup> <mi>x</mi> <mi>k</mi> <mi>p</mi> </msubsup> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> <mfrac> <mn>1</mn> <mi>p</mi> </mfrac> </msup> <mspace width="0.2em" /> <mspace width="0.2em" /> <mspace width="0.2em" /> <mspace width="0.2em" /> <mspace width="0.2em" /> <mspace width="0.2em" /> <mrow> <mo>(</mo> <mi>x</mi> <mo>≥</mo> <mn>0</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mi>x</mi> <mo>∈</mo> <msub> <mi>ℓ</mi> <mi>p</mi> </msub> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> <mo>.</mo> </math></EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\( \left ( \sum _{n = 0}^{\infty }{ \left ( {\sum _{k = 0}^{\infty }{a_{n,k} x_{k} } } \right )^{p} } \right )^{\frac{1}{p}} \ge \ell \left ( { \sum _{k = 0}^{\infty }{ x_{k}^{p} } } \right )^{\frac{1}{p}}\,\,\,\, \,\,\left (x\geq 0, x\in \ell _{p}\right ). \)</EquationSource> </Equation> In this paper, we establish the exact value of <InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="13660_2025_3354_Article_IEq3.gif" Format="GIF" Height="23" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="77" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi>L</mi> <mi>p</mi> </msub> <mrow> <mo>(</mo> <msup> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <msubsup> <mi>H</mi> <mi>μ</mi> <mi>s</mi> </msubsup> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> <mi>t</mi> </msup> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="TEX">$L_{p}\left ((H_{\mu}^{s})^{t}\right )$</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, where <InlineEquation ID="IEq4"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="13660_2025_3354_Article_IEq4.gif" Format="GIF" Height="20" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="24" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msubsup> <mi>H</mi> <mi>μ</mi> <mi>s</mi> </msubsup> </math></EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="TEX">$H_{\mu}^{s}$</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> is the generalized Hausdorff matrix and <InlineEquation ID="IEq5"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="13660_2025_3354_Article_IEq5.gif" Format="GIF" Height="16" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="72" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mn>0</mn> <mo>&lt;</mo> <mi>p</mi> <mo>≤</mo> <mn>1</mn> </math></EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="TEX">$0&lt; p\le 1$</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. We also establish a similar result for <InlineEquation ID="IEq6"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="13660_2025_3354_Article_IEq6.gif" Format="GIF" Height="21" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="53" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi>L</mi> <mi>p</mi> </msub> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <msubsup> <mi>H</mi> <mi>μ</mi> <mi>s</mi> </msubsup> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </math></EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="TEX">$L_{p}(H_{\mu}^{s})$</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> with <InlineEquation ID="IEq7"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="13660_2025_3354_Article_IEq7.gif" Format="GIF" Height="16" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="95" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mo>−</mo> <mi mathvariant="normal">∞</mi> <mo>&lt;</mo> <mi>p</mi> <mo>&lt;</mo> <mn>0</mn> </math></EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="TEX">$-\infty &lt; p&lt;0$</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. Main results of the paper fill up the gaps which the recent works of Chen and Wang have not dealt with.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

New results for generalized Hausdorff matrices

  • Gholamreza Talebi

摘要

Let A = ( a n , k ) n , k 0 $A=(a_{n,k})_{n,k\geq 0}$ be a non-negative matrix. Denote by L p ( A ) $L_{p}(A)$ , the supremum of those , satisfying the following inequality ( n = 0 ( k = 0 a n , k x k ) p ) 1 p ( k = 0 x k p ) 1 p ( x 0 , x p ) . \( \left ( \sum _{n = 0}^{\infty }{ \left ( {\sum _{k = 0}^{\infty }{a_{n,k} x_{k} } } \right )^{p} } \right )^{\frac{1}{p}} \ge \ell \left ( { \sum _{k = 0}^{\infty }{ x_{k}^{p} } } \right )^{\frac{1}{p}}\,\,\,\, \,\,\left (x\geq 0, x\in \ell _{p}\right ). \) In this paper, we establish the exact value of L p ( ( H μ s ) t ) $L_{p}\left ((H_{\mu}^{s})^{t}\right )$ , where H μ s $H_{\mu}^{s}$ is the generalized Hausdorff matrix and 0 < p 1 $0< p\le 1$ . We also establish a similar result for L p ( H μ s ) $L_{p}(H_{\mu}^{s})$ with < p < 0 $-\infty < p<0$ . Main results of the paper fill up the gaps which the recent works of Chen and Wang have not dealt with.