Grading the evidence for CPET variables in predicting perioperative morbidity and long-term mortality in lung cancer surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
摘要
Current cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) guidelines for lung cancer surgery rely on expert consensus and scientific statements, lacking robust, graded evidence. This study aimed to provide an evidence-based evaluation of CPET variables for assessing perioperative morbidity and long-term mortality risks.
MethodsElectronic databases were searched through December 20, 2025, for cohort studies on CPET variables and lung cancer surgery. Quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Heterogeneity was evaluated by the Q-test and I2 statistic, with fixed or random effects models. Publication bias was assessed via funnel plots and Egger’s test, with adjustment using the trim-and-fill method when necessary. Effect sizes were pooled, and evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.
ResultsOf 3080 studies, 47 studies involving 11,356 surgeries and 13 CPET variables were included. Meta-analysis and GRADE assessment showed lower peak oxygen uptake (peak
Among 13 CPET variables, only peak
PROSPERO CRD42023405083.