Scholarlink

<p>India’s linguistic diversity encompasses multiple language families, including the Indo-Aryan and Dravidian, which represent distinct phonological and morphological characteristics. This study aims to evaluate and compare the performance of end-to-end automatic speech recognition (ASR) systems for three Indo-Aryan languages—Marathi, Odia, and Gujarati—and three Dravidian languages—Tamil, Telugu, and Malayalam. Using four transformer-based pre-trained models—Wav2Vec2.0-base, XLSR-53, W2V2-BERT, and Whisper small—the analysis explores their adaptability to these languages’ linguistic features, with word error rate (WER) and character error rate (CER) serving as evaluation metrics. Results indicate that W2V2-BERT and XLSR-53 outperform other models, achieving lower WER and CER, especially for Indo-Aryan languages. However, higher error rates for Dravidian languages highlight challenges such as complex phonology and agglutinative morphology. This work provides a comparative insight into the strengths and limitations of pre-trained ASR models across India’s diverse linguistic landscape and underscores the need for language-specific adaptations to improve ASR accuracy for underrepresented languages.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Comparative performance analysis of end-to-end ASR models on Indo-Aryan and Dravidian languages within India’s linguistic landscape

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年2月24日

查看全文
  • Palash Jain,
  • Anirban Bhowmick

摘要

India’s linguistic diversity encompasses multiple language families, including the Indo-Aryan and Dravidian, which represent distinct phonological and morphological characteristics. This study aims to evaluate and compare the performance of end-to-end automatic speech recognition (ASR) systems for three Indo-Aryan languages—Marathi, Odia, and Gujarati—and three Dravidian languages—Tamil, Telugu, and Malayalam. Using four transformer-based pre-trained models—Wav2Vec2.0-base, XLSR-53, W2V2-BERT, and Whisper small—the analysis explores their adaptability to these languages’ linguistic features, with word error rate (WER) and character error rate (CER) serving as evaluation metrics. Results indicate that W2V2-BERT and XLSR-53 outperform other models, achieving lower WER and CER, especially for Indo-Aryan languages. However, higher error rates for Dravidian languages highlight challenges such as complex phonology and agglutinative morphology. This work provides a comparative insight into the strengths and limitations of pre-trained ASR models across India’s diverse linguistic landscape and underscores the need for language-specific adaptations to improve ASR accuracy for underrepresented languages.