Scholarlink

<p>The dynamics of Earth’s largest, most voluminous eruptions (≥ 100 km<sup>3</sup> ejecta; VEI 7) are poorly understood. Here, we explore the question of whether these very large eruptions can be treated as scaled-up versions of moderate volume historical eruptions (0.1–10 km<sup>3</sup> ejecta; VEI 4–6), or whether they should be treated as fundamentally different Earth system phenomena. To examine this, we compile fall deposit and ignimbrite volume data for 74 explosive eruptions worldwide that are magnitude 4 or greater, and use this dataset to assess how material is partitioned into buoyant plumes versus pyroclastic density currents as a function of eruption magnitude. Importantly, we filter our results by overall distance from seas/oceans, so that we can focus in on the eruptions for which preservation of the deposits is as reliable as possible. After filtering, we find that the largest eruptions are dominated by ignimbrites and not fall deposits, implying that, co-ignimbrite plumes notwithstanding, there may be little or no buoyant plume component to eruptions of the highest known magnitudes. This result is consistent with model simulations showing that the pyroclastic materials produced during larger events can be emplaced in density currents alone, and highlights important considerations for contemporary eruption simulations, the fate of volcanic gases relative to solid mass, and subsequent appraisals of the climatological and environmental impacts of explosive volcanism on Earth.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Large explosive eruptions may be dominated by pyroclastic flows instead of buoyant plumes: insights from a global data compilation

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年3月14日

查看全文
  • Alice R. Paine,
  • Fabian B. Wadsworth

摘要

The dynamics of Earth’s largest, most voluminous eruptions (≥ 100 km3 ejecta; VEI 7) are poorly understood. Here, we explore the question of whether these very large eruptions can be treated as scaled-up versions of moderate volume historical eruptions (0.1–10 km3 ejecta; VEI 4–6), or whether they should be treated as fundamentally different Earth system phenomena. To examine this, we compile fall deposit and ignimbrite volume data for 74 explosive eruptions worldwide that are magnitude 4 or greater, and use this dataset to assess how material is partitioned into buoyant plumes versus pyroclastic density currents as a function of eruption magnitude. Importantly, we filter our results by overall distance from seas/oceans, so that we can focus in on the eruptions for which preservation of the deposits is as reliable as possible. After filtering, we find that the largest eruptions are dominated by ignimbrites and not fall deposits, implying that, co-ignimbrite plumes notwithstanding, there may be little or no buoyant plume component to eruptions of the highest known magnitudes. This result is consistent with model simulations showing that the pyroclastic materials produced during larger events can be emplaced in density currents alone, and highlights important considerations for contemporary eruption simulations, the fate of volcanic gases relative to solid mass, and subsequent appraisals of the climatological and environmental impacts of explosive volcanism on Earth.