Objectives Over the last few years, with the introduction of advanced MR imaging techniques, increasing exam demand and the growth of multi-center clinical trials and artificial intelligence (AI)-driven analysis, it has become increasingly difficult to guarantee image quality across time and institutions. Quality Assurance (QA) and Quality Control (QC) programs have therefore become essential. The aim of the survey was to map how MRI QA and QC are implemented in routine clinical practice and, where applicable, in research settings, across Europe, to identify the points where harmonization, coordination, or further education is needed. Materials and methods An anonymous survey was distributed between October and December 2024 through ESR, EFOMP, EFRS member societies and ESMRMB to healthcare professionals, addressing five broad categories: characteristics of participants and their institutions, national MRI QA/QC guidelines/legislation and awareness, local organization for MRI QA, local (institute level) organization for MRI system performance QCs, conventional imaging QCs and qMRI QCs. Results 269 responses were obtained from 37 different countries. Respondents were radiologists (52%), followed by Medical Physics Experts/Physicists/Engineers (30%), and radiographers (17%). Only a few countries have mandated national legislation addressing MRI QA/QC, while many others rely on voluntary guidelines or lack formal protocols. Most respondents recognized the importance of robust QA/QC programs. There is a strong consensus among respondents on the need for harmonized guidelines from organizations like ESR, multidisciplinary collaboration, and easily accessible training. Conclusions The European landscape regarding MRI quality is very heterogeneous, with different regulations across countries, and different penetration of MRI QA and QC training and regulation. The European Society of Radiology is optimally positioned with partners to play an active role in the harmonization of MRI quality education and practices across Europe, and we propose the development of a set of recommendations for MRI quality control and assurance. Critical relevance statement There is scope for raising awareness of both MRI Quality Control (QC) and Quality Assurance (QA) issues and improvement in these fields to ensure patient safety, reduce diagnostic errors, and allow more patients to benefit from MR imaging. Key Points <UnorderedList Mark="Bullet"> <ItemContent> Our survey of MRI QA and QC practices across Europe revealed significant heterogeneity in regulations and practices between countries and institutions. </ItemContent> <ItemContent> There is a widespread lack of awareness and implementation of MRI quality guidelines. </ItemContent> <ItemContent> The ESR MR Safety and Quality Committee advocates for the standardization and enhancement of MRI quality training for all professionals involved in this issue. </ItemContent> </UnorderedList> Graphical Abstract

The MR quality landscape in Europe

期刊论文
出版模式：

开放获取
发表日期：

2026年5月7日

查看全文

Simone Busoni,
Anna Pichiecchio,
Lara Cristiano,
Andrew England,
Edwin H. G. Oei,
Peter Lundberg,
Michelle C. Williams,
Francesco Santini,
Emanuele Neri

摘要

Objectives

Over the last few years, with the introduction of advanced MR imaging techniques, increasing exam demand and the growth of multi-center clinical trials and artificial intelligence (AI)-driven analysis, it has become increasingly difficult to guarantee image quality across time and institutions. Quality Assurance (QA) and Quality Control (QC) programs have therefore become essential. The aim of the survey was to map how MRI QA and QC are implemented in routine clinical practice and, where applicable, in research settings, across Europe, to identify the points where harmonization, coordination, or further education is needed.

Materials and methods

An anonymous survey was distributed between October and December 2024 through ESR, EFOMP, EFRS member societies and ESMRMB to healthcare professionals, addressing five broad categories: characteristics of participants and their institutions, national MRI QA/QC guidelines/legislation and awareness, local organization for MRI QA, local (institute level) organization for MRI system performance QCs, conventional imaging QCs and qMRI QCs.

Results

269 responses were obtained from 37 different countries. Respondents were radiologists (52%), followed by Medical Physics Experts/Physicists/Engineers (30%), and radiographers (17%). Only a few countries have mandated national legislation addressing MRI QA/QC, while many others rely on voluntary guidelines or lack formal protocols. Most respondents recognized the importance of robust QA/QC programs. There is a strong consensus among respondents on the need for harmonized guidelines from organizations like ESR, multidisciplinary collaboration, and easily accessible training.

Conclusions

The European landscape regarding MRI quality is very heterogeneous, with different regulations across countries, and different penetration of MRI QA and QC training and regulation. The European Society of Radiology is optimally positioned with partners to play an active role in the harmonization of MRI quality education and practices across Europe, and we propose the development of a set of recommendations for MRI quality control and assurance.

Critical relevance statement

There is scope for raising awareness of both MRI Quality Control (QC) and Quality Assurance (QA) issues and improvement in these fields to ensure patient safety, reduce diagnostic errors, and allow more patients to benefit from MR imaging.

Key Points

Our survey of MRI QA and QC practices across Europe revealed significant heterogeneity in regulations and practices between countries and institutions.

There is a widespread lack of awareness and implementation of MRI quality guidelines.

The ESR MR Safety and Quality Committee advocates for the standardization and enhancement of MRI quality training for all professionals involved in this issue.

Graphical Abstract