Epigenetic g predicts cognitive function in a diverse, nationally representative sample of older adults
摘要
Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias (ADRD) are major public health concerns. DNA methylation (DNAm)–based biomarkers such as GrimAge and PhenoAge predict aging and health risk, but were not designed to optimize prediction of cognitive function or decline. Epigenetic g—a DNAm-derived index of general cognitive ability—is a promising marker of cognitive function that has not been assessed in a racially and socioeconomically diverse population.
MethodsWe used data from the 2016 Venous Blood Study of the Health and Retirement Study (HRS), a nationally representative cohort of U.S. adults aged ≥ 51 years (N = 3575 with high-quality DNAm). Epigenetic g scores were computed using CpG weights from a BayesR+ model of general cognitive ability developed in Generation Scotland. Cognitive function was measured with a modified version of the Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status (TICS) at each interview wave. Linear regression estimated associations with cognitive scores; mixed-effect growth curve models estimated the association with cognitive change. Models were adjusted sequentially for demographics, education, parental education, APOE ε4 status, and blood-based neurodegeneration markers (NfL, GFAP, Aβ42/40, pTau181).
ResultsHigher epigenetic g was associated with better baseline cognition (β = 2.55, 95% CI 1.80–3.30)) and cognition at the time DNAm was measured (β = 2.30, 95% CI 1.47–3.13) after demographic adjustment. Associations were attenuated but remained significant with education and parental education (β = 1.23–1.89). In growth curve models, Epigenetic g was associated with higher cognitive performance but did not have a statistically significant association with decline over a 6-year period. Results were robust to adjustment for APOE ε4 and neurodegeneration biomarkers.
ConclusionsEpigenetic g is a scalable, blood-based marker of cognitive function, and potentially or cognitive reserve, that adds predictive value beyond demographics, socioeconomic indicators, APOE, and neuropathology. Its validation in a diverse, nationally representative U.S. cohort underscores its potential for early risk profiling and for research on social determinants of cognitive aging in cross-national samples.