Scholarlink

Objective <p>This study aimed to determine the optimal camera configuration for a markerless motion capture system, which may offer a lower-cost alternative to laboratory based systems. It validated the system’s performance against a gold standard during both static postures and a dynamic lifting task, addressing a key gap regarding the impact of camera arrangement on measurement validity. Six unique stereo camera pairs were calibrated for 3D reconstruction using MediaPipe. Joint angles were computed, and agreement was assessed using Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC), and Bland-Altman analysis.</p> Results <p>System performance was highly sensitive to camera geometry. The optimal configuration (approximately 45 degrees separation) demonstrated excellent agreement for both static (ICC = 0.851, MAE = 9.28 degrees) and dynamic (ICC = 0.823, MAE = 12.92 degrees) tasks. Major peripheral joints (hips, knees, shoulders) showed good to excellent reliability (ICC = 0.73–0.92), while neck showed only moderate agreement (ICC = 0.56–0.66). Configurations with very wide baselines (greater than 90 degrees) performed poorly (ICC &lt; 0.40). A two-camera setup with a narrow baseline can yield clinically useful joint angle estimates for major joints, providing practical guidance for affordable motion-capture deployment in biomechanics, ergonomics, and rehabilitation.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Optimizing camera placement in multi-view markerless motion capture: a validation study against gold-standard kinematics for static and dynamic tasks

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年5月24日

查看全文
  • Ali Sahraneshin Samani,
  • Mohsen Razeghi,
  • Mohammad Abdoli-Eramaki,
  • Alireza Choobineh

摘要

Objective

This study aimed to determine the optimal camera configuration for a markerless motion capture system, which may offer a lower-cost alternative to laboratory based systems. It validated the system’s performance against a gold standard during both static postures and a dynamic lifting task, addressing a key gap regarding the impact of camera arrangement on measurement validity. Six unique stereo camera pairs were calibrated for 3D reconstruction using MediaPipe. Joint angles were computed, and agreement was assessed using Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC), and Bland-Altman analysis.

Results

System performance was highly sensitive to camera geometry. The optimal configuration (approximately 45 degrees separation) demonstrated excellent agreement for both static (ICC = 0.851, MAE = 9.28 degrees) and dynamic (ICC = 0.823, MAE = 12.92 degrees) tasks. Major peripheral joints (hips, knees, shoulders) showed good to excellent reliability (ICC = 0.73–0.92), while neck showed only moderate agreement (ICC = 0.56–0.66). Configurations with very wide baselines (greater than 90 degrees) performed poorly (ICC < 0.40). A two-camera setup with a narrow baseline can yield clinically useful joint angle estimates for major joints, providing practical guidance for affordable motion-capture deployment in biomechanics, ergonomics, and rehabilitation.