Scholarlink

Background <p>This meta-analysis compared the effects of velocity-based training (VBT) and traditional percentage-based training (PBT) on athletic performance, specifically in muscle strength, jump performance, sprint performance, and change-of-direction ability.</p> Methodology <p>Random-effects models in R were employed for the meta-analysis, and study quality was assessed using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale.</p> Results <p>A total of 17 studies with 348 participants were included in the analysis. The results revealed that VBT produced small but significant improvements in jump performance (SMD = 0.27, 95% CI: [0.03, 0.51], <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05) and change-of-direction ability (SMD = 0.45, 95% CI: [0.17, 0.73], <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01) compared to PBT. However, no significant differences were found in maximal strength (SMD = 0.21, 95% CI: [-0.01, 0.43], <i>p</i> = 0.064) or sprint performance (SMD = 0.14, 95% CI: [-0.11, 0.39], <i>p</i> = 0.269).</p> Conclusions <p>VBT shows small but significant advantages over PBT in improving jump performance and change-of-direction ability. Both methods exhibit similar effects on maximal strength and sprint performance. These findings support implementing VBT for sports requiring rapid force production and directional changes.</p> Trial registration <p>The prospero registration number: CRD420251020164.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

The effects of velocity-based vs. percentage-based resistance training on sports performance in trainedindividuals: a systematic review and meta-analysis

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年1月5日

查看全文
  • Yue Wang,
  • Jianguo Qiu,
  • Donghui Dai,
  • Qi Li,
  • Xiaolin Wang,
  • Qunzhi Luo

摘要

Background

This meta-analysis compared the effects of velocity-based training (VBT) and traditional percentage-based training (PBT) on athletic performance, specifically in muscle strength, jump performance, sprint performance, and change-of-direction ability.

Methodology

Random-effects models in R were employed for the meta-analysis, and study quality was assessed using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale.

Results

A total of 17 studies with 348 participants were included in the analysis. The results revealed that VBT produced small but significant improvements in jump performance (SMD = 0.27, 95% CI: [0.03, 0.51], p < 0.05) and change-of-direction ability (SMD = 0.45, 95% CI: [0.17, 0.73], p < 0.01) compared to PBT. However, no significant differences were found in maximal strength (SMD = 0.21, 95% CI: [-0.01, 0.43], p = 0.064) or sprint performance (SMD = 0.14, 95% CI: [-0.11, 0.39], p = 0.269).

Conclusions

VBT shows small but significant advantages over PBT in improving jump performance and change-of-direction ability. Both methods exhibit similar effects on maximal strength and sprint performance. These findings support implementing VBT for sports requiring rapid force production and directional changes.

Trial registration

The prospero registration number: CRD420251020164.