Scholarlink

<p>This meta-analysis synthesizes evidence from 25 randomized controlled trials (<i>N</i> = 3,659) examining basketball training’s effects on adolescents’ physical fitness parameters, revealing significant improvements in strength and explosive power with boys showing marked gains in standing long jump (effect size d = 0.71, 95% CI [0.34, 1.08], <i>P</i> = 0.0002) and pull-ups (d = 0.86, 95% CI [-0.02, 1.74], <i>P</i> = 0.05), while girls exhibited substantial increases in sit-up performance (d = 5.12, 95% CI [3.83, 6.40], <i>P</i> &lt; 0.00001). Lung capacity also improved notably, particularly in boys (d = 0.39, 95% CI [0.16, 0.63], <i>P</i> = 0.001), though significant heterogeneity was observed across studies (I²=79–96%) due to variations in training protocols, baseline fitness levels, and measurement tools. Subgroup analyses demonstrated optimized outcomes with interventions exceeding 12 weeks and moderate training frequency (3–4 sessions weekly), providing evidence for designing structured basketball programs to enhance adolescents’ physical development.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Quantitative research on the training effect of youth basketball: impact on physical fitness indicators – a systematic review and meta-analysis

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年11月24日

查看全文
  • Xiao-Dong Liu,
  • Yu-Tong Li

摘要

This meta-analysis synthesizes evidence from 25 randomized controlled trials (N = 3,659) examining basketball training’s effects on adolescents’ physical fitness parameters, revealing significant improvements in strength and explosive power with boys showing marked gains in standing long jump (effect size d = 0.71, 95% CI [0.34, 1.08], P = 0.0002) and pull-ups (d = 0.86, 95% CI [-0.02, 1.74], P = 0.05), while girls exhibited substantial increases in sit-up performance (d = 5.12, 95% CI [3.83, 6.40], P < 0.00001). Lung capacity also improved notably, particularly in boys (d = 0.39, 95% CI [0.16, 0.63], P = 0.001), though significant heterogeneity was observed across studies (I²=79–96%) due to variations in training protocols, baseline fitness levels, and measurement tools. Subgroup analyses demonstrated optimized outcomes with interventions exceeding 12 weeks and moderate training frequency (3–4 sessions weekly), providing evidence for designing structured basketball programs to enhance adolescents’ physical development.