Scholarlink

Background <p>Prior research has suggested links between youth sport special-ization, inter-limb asymmetries, and injury risk, but findings remain inconsistent regarding whether single-sport athletes show greater asymmetries than their multi-sport peers. This study examined differences in inter-limb asymme-try (global, balance, strength) between single- and multi-sport athletes, and explored the prevalence of exceeding clinical thresholds, sex- and sport-specific interactions, and associations with training volume and injury history.</p> Methods <p>A cross-sectional study was conducted on 76 youth athletes (24 single-sport, 52 multi-sport; mean age 12.6 ± 1.7&#xa0;years) using standardized assessments of dynamic balance (Y-Balance Test) and isometric strength (hand-held dynamometry). Inter-limb asymmetry was calculated using Index-9 in three domains: global asymmetry, balance asymmetry, and strength asymmetry. Differ-ences between single-sport specialists and multi-sport athletes were tested using linear mixed effect models, adjusted for sex, maturity status, BMI, training vol-ume, and sport type. Sensitivity and interaction analyzes (e.g., sport symmetry, sex, injury history) were also performed.</p> Results <p>Inter-limb strength asymmetries greater than 10% were observed in more than half of the participants, especially for ankle plantarflexion and hip abduction. Balance asymmetries were smaller, with fewer than 15% of athletes exceeding the 10% threshold. Training volume was higher in the single-sport group, but was not associated with greater asymmetry. No significant differences were found between single and multisport athletes for global (<i>β</i> = 0<i>.</i>039, <i>p</i> = <i>.</i>597), balance (<i>β</i> = 0<i>.</i>037, <i>p</i> = <i>.</i>745) or strength asymmetry (<i>β</i> = 0<i>.</i>013, <i>p</i> = <i>.</i>879). These null results persisted across the sensitivity analyses and interaction models.</p> Conclusions <p>Despite higher training volumes, single-sport youth athletes did not exhibit greater balance or strength asymmetries than their multi-sport peers. Inter-limb asymmetries were common across the cohort but were not associated with sport specialization. These findings highlight the need for cautious, individ-ualized interpretation of asymmetry measures in youth athletes, and underscore the importance of further research to clarify their developmental and clinical significance.</p> Trial registrations <p>ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06325228); registered on 10/03/2024.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Strength and balance asymmetries in children and adolescents: comparison between single- and multi-sport participants

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年11月27日

查看全文
  • Bartosz Wilczyński,
  • Jakub Buler,
  • Rafa l Buler,
  • Micha l Grochowski,
  • Bartosz Puchalski,
  • Katarzyna Zorena

摘要

Background

Prior research has suggested links between youth sport special-ization, inter-limb asymmetries, and injury risk, but findings remain inconsistent regarding whether single-sport athletes show greater asymmetries than their multi-sport peers. This study examined differences in inter-limb asymme-try (global, balance, strength) between single- and multi-sport athletes, and explored the prevalence of exceeding clinical thresholds, sex- and sport-specific interactions, and associations with training volume and injury history.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted on 76 youth athletes (24 single-sport, 52 multi-sport; mean age 12.6 ± 1.7 years) using standardized assessments of dynamic balance (Y-Balance Test) and isometric strength (hand-held dynamometry). Inter-limb asymmetry was calculated using Index-9 in three domains: global asymmetry, balance asymmetry, and strength asymmetry. Differ-ences between single-sport specialists and multi-sport athletes were tested using linear mixed effect models, adjusted for sex, maturity status, BMI, training vol-ume, and sport type. Sensitivity and interaction analyzes (e.g., sport symmetry, sex, injury history) were also performed.

Results

Inter-limb strength asymmetries greater than 10% were observed in more than half of the participants, especially for ankle plantarflexion and hip abduction. Balance asymmetries were smaller, with fewer than 15% of athletes exceeding the 10% threshold. Training volume was higher in the single-sport group, but was not associated with greater asymmetry. No significant differences were found between single and multisport athletes for global (β = 0.039, p = .597), balance (β = 0.037, p = .745) or strength asymmetry (β = 0.013, p = .879). These null results persisted across the sensitivity analyses and interaction models.

Conclusions

Despite higher training volumes, single-sport youth athletes did not exhibit greater balance or strength asymmetries than their multi-sport peers. Inter-limb asymmetries were common across the cohort but were not associated with sport specialization. These findings highlight the need for cautious, individ-ualized interpretation of asymmetry measures in youth athletes, and underscore the importance of further research to clarify their developmental and clinical significance.

Trial registrations

ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06325228); registered on 10/03/2024.