Scholarlink

Background <p>This study aims to propose an alternative solution for determining the optimal training load to meet the high physiological demands of football, encompassing both metabolic and locomotor loads. To this end, two different formats, repetitive sprint training (RST) and sided games (SGs), were evaluated in terms of energy cost (EC), and their similarities were revealed.</p> Methods <p>The study was conducted with 21 men soccer players (age: 18.24 ± 0.63 yrs, training age: 7.24 ± 0.63 yrs, body weight: 73.01 ± 7.47&#xa0;kg). RST and various-sided games (4 × 4 small-sided games and 6 × 6 medium-sided games) were played according to the rules, with goalkeeper and ball possession rules tailored to different field dimensions. Both training methods were performed separately on matchday + 4 / -3 within a weekly cycle. While all SGs work for 420&#xa0;s and rest for 4&#xa0;min, RST performed 720&#xa0;m. with 20&#xa0;s rest between bouts and 4&#xa0;min between sets. EC was measured using global positioning system technology during all training sessions, considering total and equivalent running distance.</p> Results <p>The study demonstrated that the 4v4 + Goalkeeper SSG and RST energy cost results EC cost results in similar conditioning improvement (5917.76&#xa0;J/kg and 6181.00&#xa0;J/kg, respectively).</p> Conclusion <p>As a result of the study, 4v4 + Gk SSG showed similar results regarding energy cost with RST. Additionally, it was determined that metabolic demands increased as the number of players decreased in SGs with constant m² per player.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Energy cost and game dynamics in soccer: comparing sided games and repeated sprint training

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年8月15日

查看全文
  • Ersin Akılveren,
  • Asuman Şahan,
  • Emel Çetin Özdoğan

摘要

Background

This study aims to propose an alternative solution for determining the optimal training load to meet the high physiological demands of football, encompassing both metabolic and locomotor loads. To this end, two different formats, repetitive sprint training (RST) and sided games (SGs), were evaluated in terms of energy cost (EC), and their similarities were revealed.

Methods

The study was conducted with 21 men soccer players (age: 18.24 ± 0.63 yrs, training age: 7.24 ± 0.63 yrs, body weight: 73.01 ± 7.47 kg). RST and various-sided games (4 × 4 small-sided games and 6 × 6 medium-sided games) were played according to the rules, with goalkeeper and ball possession rules tailored to different field dimensions. Both training methods were performed separately on matchday + 4 / -3 within a weekly cycle. While all SGs work for 420 s and rest for 4 min, RST performed 720 m. with 20 s rest between bouts and 4 min between sets. EC was measured using global positioning system technology during all training sessions, considering total and equivalent running distance.

Results

The study demonstrated that the 4v4 + Goalkeeper SSG and RST energy cost results EC cost results in similar conditioning improvement (5917.76 J/kg and 6181.00 J/kg, respectively).

Conclusion

As a result of the study, 4v4 + Gk SSG showed similar results regarding energy cost with RST. Additionally, it was determined that metabolic demands increased as the number of players decreased in SGs with constant m² per player.