Background <p>Neuromuscular diseases (NMDs) can impair respiratory muscle function, leading to increased morbidity and mortality. Respiratory muscle training (RMT) is widely used to manage these respiratory complications, but its efficacy across different NMDs remains unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the impact of physiotherapy interventions, specifically RMT, on respiratory muscle function in NMD patients.</p> Methods <p>A systematic search of multiple databases, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane, CRS-Web, PEDro, LILACS, ICTPR, the China National Knowledge Infrastructure database, and ClinicalTrials.gov, was conducted up to February 2025. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies evaluating RMT’s effect on lung volumes and respiratory muscle strength in NMD patients were included. Risk of bias assessment was performed using Cochrane Risk of bias tool for RCTs and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for cohorts. Meta-analyses were performed using a random-effects model, and heterogeneity was assessed with I² statistics.</p> Results <p>Sixteen studies were analyzed from 9,626 screened articles. The meta-analysis demonstrated significant improvements in respiratory muscle strength, particularly in maximal inspiratory pressure (MD: 6.83 cmH₂O, 95% CI: 2.08 to 11.58, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01, I² = 3.8%) and maximal expiratory pressure (MD: 13.05 cmH₂O, 95% CI: 3.65to 22.42, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01, I² = 43%). No significant improvements were observed in forced vital capacity (MD: 3.13%, 95% CI: -8.06 to 14.34, <i>p</i> = 0.58), sniff nasal inspiratory pressure (MD: 1.47 cmH₂O, 95% CI: -15.45 to 18.39, <i>p</i> = 0.86), forced expiratory volume in one second (MD: -0.02&#xa0;L, 95% CI: -0.17 to 0.13, <i>p</i> = 0.78), and vital capacity (MD: -0.10&#xa0;L, 95% CI: -0.31 to 0.11, <i>p</i> = 0.33).</p> Conclusion <p>This review supports the role of respiratory muscle training in improving inspiratory and expiratory muscle strength in patients with neuromuscular diseases. However, variability in study methodologies and patient populations limits the statistical significance of some respiratory parameters. Future studies should aim to standardize interventions and outcome measures to provide more conclusive evidence on the efficacy of RMT.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

The impact of respiratory muscle training on respiratory function in patients with neuromuscular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

  • Nancy Yesenia Ortiz-Garcia,
  • Diego Eduardo Rueda-Capristran,
  • Ajay Kumar,
  • Domenica Alejandra Herrera,
  • Angie Carolina Alonso-Ramírez,
  • Diana Othón-Martínez,
  • Jonathan Reyes-Rivera,
  • Frances Marie Mejia,
  • Jonathan David Martinez-Illan,
  • Carla Isabella Miret Durazo,
  • Elda Janette Perez-Moreno,
  • Camila Sánchez Cruz,
  • Ernesto Calderon Martinez

摘要

Background

Neuromuscular diseases (NMDs) can impair respiratory muscle function, leading to increased morbidity and mortality. Respiratory muscle training (RMT) is widely used to manage these respiratory complications, but its efficacy across different NMDs remains unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the impact of physiotherapy interventions, specifically RMT, on respiratory muscle function in NMD patients.

Methods

A systematic search of multiple databases, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane, CRS-Web, PEDro, LILACS, ICTPR, the China National Knowledge Infrastructure database, and ClinicalTrials.gov, was conducted up to February 2025. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies evaluating RMT’s effect on lung volumes and respiratory muscle strength in NMD patients were included. Risk of bias assessment was performed using Cochrane Risk of bias tool for RCTs and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for cohorts. Meta-analyses were performed using a random-effects model, and heterogeneity was assessed with I² statistics.

Results

Sixteen studies were analyzed from 9,626 screened articles. The meta-analysis demonstrated significant improvements in respiratory muscle strength, particularly in maximal inspiratory pressure (MD: 6.83 cmH₂O, 95% CI: 2.08 to 11.58, p < 0.01, I² = 3.8%) and maximal expiratory pressure (MD: 13.05 cmH₂O, 95% CI: 3.65to 22.42, p < 0.01, I² = 43%). No significant improvements were observed in forced vital capacity (MD: 3.13%, 95% CI: -8.06 to 14.34, p = 0.58), sniff nasal inspiratory pressure (MD: 1.47 cmH₂O, 95% CI: -15.45 to 18.39, p = 0.86), forced expiratory volume in one second (MD: -0.02 L, 95% CI: -0.17 to 0.13, p = 0.78), and vital capacity (MD: -0.10 L, 95% CI: -0.31 to 0.11, p = 0.33).

Conclusion

This review supports the role of respiratory muscle training in improving inspiratory and expiratory muscle strength in patients with neuromuscular diseases. However, variability in study methodologies and patient populations limits the statistical significance of some respiratory parameters. Future studies should aim to standardize interventions and outcome measures to provide more conclusive evidence on the efficacy of RMT.