Background <p>Guideline-concordant screenings for hydroxychloroquine retinopathy (HCQ-R) are essential for safe long-term use of HCQ. We assessed adherence to the HCQ-R screening recommendations among patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) or rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and evaluated patient- and health system-level predictors of adherence.</p> Methods <p>We conducted a longitudinal population-based cohort study (1997–2023) using linked British Columbia administrative health data capturing all physician and hospital encounters, tests billed, pharmacy-dispensed medications, and demographics. Using previously published algorithms, we identified all adults with SLE or RA who initiated HCQ after diagnosis and remained on therapy continuously for ≥ 1 year. Guideline-concordant (valid) screening was defined as a retinal visit (ICD-9 362.xx) with spectral domain optical coherence tomography and/or visual field-testing fee(s) (22067/02043) within a ± 30-day window, from baseline (HCQ initiation) until 31-Dec-2023, HCQ cessation, or censoring. Population-level adherence was assessed based on baseline and annual rates of valid screening. Patient-level adherence was assessed as the mean cumulative count of valid screenings received by each year of follow-up, with 95% CIs. Predictors of annual valid screening, including physician-care patterns (continuous vs. noncontinuous rheumatology vs. family-physician care), health authority regions, socioeconomic status (SES) and baseline screening, were assessed via multivariable generalized estimating equations adjusted for demographics and comorbidities.</p> Results <p>Of the 28,301 eligible patients for screening, 24% completed a valid baseline screening within year 1; during years 2–25, the annual rate of valid screenings ranged from 20 to 35%, and 70% remained unscreened on average. By 15 years, patients received on average 2.7 (95% CI, 2.6–2.8) valid screenings compared with at least 12 expected by this time, as recommended by the guidelines. Having a baseline screening was the strongest predictor of subsequent annual screenings (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 5.71; 95% CI: 4.89–6.67). Compared with continuous rheumatology care, family physician care had lower odds of screening (aOR, 0.59; 0.49–0.72). Most regions had lower screening rates than did Vancouver Coastal Health (9.50%-24.57%), with the lowest screening rate in Island Health (aOR, 0.39; 0.30–0.51). SES was not significantly associated with the odds of receiving annual screening.</p> Conclusions <p>Guideline-recommended HCQ-R screening adherence was consistently low within a publicly funded health-care system; on average, one-fourth of patients on long-term HCQ, completed a valid screening annually. Strategies to strengthen guideline-based practices and reduce regional disparities are needed.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Gaps in care for hydroxychloroquine retinopathy screening in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus or rheumatoid arthritis: a population-based cohort study

  • Narsis Daftarian,
  • Steve D. Levasseur,
  • Hui Xie,
  • Diane Lacaille,
  • J. Antonio Avina-Zubieta

摘要

Background

Guideline-concordant screenings for hydroxychloroquine retinopathy (HCQ-R) are essential for safe long-term use of HCQ. We assessed adherence to the HCQ-R screening recommendations among patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) or rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and evaluated patient- and health system-level predictors of adherence.

Methods

We conducted a longitudinal population-based cohort study (1997–2023) using linked British Columbia administrative health data capturing all physician and hospital encounters, tests billed, pharmacy-dispensed medications, and demographics. Using previously published algorithms, we identified all adults with SLE or RA who initiated HCQ after diagnosis and remained on therapy continuously for ≥ 1 year. Guideline-concordant (valid) screening was defined as a retinal visit (ICD-9 362.xx) with spectral domain optical coherence tomography and/or visual field-testing fee(s) (22067/02043) within a ± 30-day window, from baseline (HCQ initiation) until 31-Dec-2023, HCQ cessation, or censoring. Population-level adherence was assessed based on baseline and annual rates of valid screening. Patient-level adherence was assessed as the mean cumulative count of valid screenings received by each year of follow-up, with 95% CIs. Predictors of annual valid screening, including physician-care patterns (continuous vs. noncontinuous rheumatology vs. family-physician care), health authority regions, socioeconomic status (SES) and baseline screening, were assessed via multivariable generalized estimating equations adjusted for demographics and comorbidities.

Results

Of the 28,301 eligible patients for screening, 24% completed a valid baseline screening within year 1; during years 2–25, the annual rate of valid screenings ranged from 20 to 35%, and 70% remained unscreened on average. By 15 years, patients received on average 2.7 (95% CI, 2.6–2.8) valid screenings compared with at least 12 expected by this time, as recommended by the guidelines. Having a baseline screening was the strongest predictor of subsequent annual screenings (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 5.71; 95% CI: 4.89–6.67). Compared with continuous rheumatology care, family physician care had lower odds of screening (aOR, 0.59; 0.49–0.72). Most regions had lower screening rates than did Vancouver Coastal Health (9.50%-24.57%), with the lowest screening rate in Island Health (aOR, 0.39; 0.30–0.51). SES was not significantly associated with the odds of receiving annual screening.

Conclusions

Guideline-recommended HCQ-R screening adherence was consistently low within a publicly funded health-care system; on average, one-fourth of patients on long-term HCQ, completed a valid screening annually. Strategies to strengthen guideline-based practices and reduce regional disparities are needed.