Scholarlink

Abstract <p>A recent meta-analysis published in <i>Parasites &amp; Vectors</i> [17(1):444, 2024] re-evaluated the prevalence of feline hemotropic <i>Mycoplasma</i> spp. in <i>Ctenocephalides felis</i>. The authors compared prevalence studies using different PCR primers: those employing Jensen or Manvell primers reported high prevalence (~ 33%), while others showed much lower rates (&lt; 1%). To investigate potential Jensen/Manvell primer non-specificity, the authors used both primers and sequencing to reanalyze archived individual flea samples from pools previously reported as positive by Jensen primer-based PCR. Based on low prevalence and non-specific amplifications, they questioned primer specificity and concluded that prevalence was lower than previously reported, and that <i>C. felis</i> is less likely to be a vector of feline hemotropic <i>Mycoplasma</i> spp. This correspondence critically reassesses that conclusion by highlighting multiple methodological and interpretive flaws in the meta-analysis. Sequencing-confirmed <i>Mycoplasma</i> spp. detections from Jensen primer-based studies were disregarded and key data from source studies, including prevalence values and flea washing/pooling practices, were misreported in the meta-analysis. The reanalysis experiment suffered from design limitations, including mismatched sampling units (individual vs pools), unclear distribution of results across previously reported positive pools, and unaddressed confounders such as DNA degradation and contamination over ~ 12&#xa0;years of storage. Grouping Jensen and Manvell primers, despite their distinct diagnostic behaviors, further undermines the analysis. Alternative explanations for prevalence variation, such as population heterogeneity, pooling flea samples, primer sensitivity, and strain variation, were not considered. The citations were used selectively to emphasize supporting studies, while contradictory evidence was omitted. Due to these limitations, the revised prevalence estimate is not supported, and the vectorial role of <i>C. felis</i> remains unresolved, necessitating further well-designed studies to establish its true epidemiological role.</p> Graphical Abstract <p></p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

A case of a misleading conclusion: a critical reassessment of the methodological and interpretive flaws of a recent meta-analysis of the vector role of cat fleas in feline hemotropic Mycoplasma species transmission

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年11月16日

查看全文
  • Mahmoud S. Safwat

摘要

Abstract

A recent meta-analysis published in Parasites & Vectors [17(1):444, 2024] re-evaluated the prevalence of feline hemotropic Mycoplasma spp. in Ctenocephalides felis. The authors compared prevalence studies using different PCR primers: those employing Jensen or Manvell primers reported high prevalence (~ 33%), while others showed much lower rates (< 1%). To investigate potential Jensen/Manvell primer non-specificity, the authors used both primers and sequencing to reanalyze archived individual flea samples from pools previously reported as positive by Jensen primer-based PCR. Based on low prevalence and non-specific amplifications, they questioned primer specificity and concluded that prevalence was lower than previously reported, and that C. felis is less likely to be a vector of feline hemotropic Mycoplasma spp. This correspondence critically reassesses that conclusion by highlighting multiple methodological and interpretive flaws in the meta-analysis. Sequencing-confirmed Mycoplasma spp. detections from Jensen primer-based studies were disregarded and key data from source studies, including prevalence values and flea washing/pooling practices, were misreported in the meta-analysis. The reanalysis experiment suffered from design limitations, including mismatched sampling units (individual vs pools), unclear distribution of results across previously reported positive pools, and unaddressed confounders such as DNA degradation and contamination over ~ 12 years of storage. Grouping Jensen and Manvell primers, despite their distinct diagnostic behaviors, further undermines the analysis. Alternative explanations for prevalence variation, such as population heterogeneity, pooling flea samples, primer sensitivity, and strain variation, were not considered. The citations were used selectively to emphasize supporting studies, while contradictory evidence was omitted. Due to these limitations, the revised prevalence estimate is not supported, and the vectorial role of C. felis remains unresolved, necessitating further well-designed studies to establish its true epidemiological role.

Graphical Abstract