Scholarlink

Background <p><i>Aedes aegypti</i> is the primary vector of arboviruses, including dengue, Zika and chikungunya, representing a major global public health concern. Owing to the lack of effective vaccines and specific therapeutic options for these infections, vector control remains the main strategy to limit their spread. Traditionally, vector control has relied on extensive use of insecticides combined with the elimination of breeding sites. However, in addition to selecting for insecticide-resistant mosquitoes, concerns have arisen about behavioural effects induced by insecticides, particularly repellency – defined as the ability of a chemical compound to trigger avoidance behaviour in insects, thereby reducing their exposure to treated surfaces. This systematic review aimed to synthesise current knowledge on repellent effects of certain insecticides on <i>A. aegypti</i>.</p> Methods <p>A literature search was conducted in the databases Virtual Health Library (BVS), PubMed® and Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO), following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A total of 46 original studies published between 1990 and 2023 were included.</p> Results <p>Altogether, 433 bioassays were analysed, of which 69.8% reported repellent effects. The most common methods used to assess repellency were excito-repellency chambers, HITSS assays and the arm-in-cage test. Pyrethroids were used in 86.6% of repellency assays, followed by organochlorines (9.4%). Regarding the resistance profile of tested mosquito populations, susceptible populations exhibited higher frequencies of contact (92.2%) and spatial (77.3%) repellency behaviours than resistant ones (74.1% and 44.0%, respectively).</p> Conclusions <p>Our findings indicate that insecticide-induced repellency is common and may interfere with the effectiveness of chemical control strategies. Nevertheless, studies addressing the underlying molecular and sensory mechanisms involved in repellent perception remain scarce.</p> Graphical Abstract <p></p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Repellent effects of insecticides against Aedes aegypti: a systematic review

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年12月16日

查看全文
  • Leonardo Barbosa Koerich,
  • Artur Metzker Serravite,
  • Pedro Henryque de Castro,
  • Julia Paula Rabelo,
  • Pedro Horta Andrade,
  • Daniel Milagre Marques,
  • Marcos Horácio Pereira,
  • Mauricio Roberto Vianna Sant’Anna,
  • Nelder Figueiredo Gontijo,
  • Juliana Maria Trindade Bezerra,
  • Grasielle Caldas D.’Ávila Pessoa

摘要

Background

Aedes aegypti is the primary vector of arboviruses, including dengue, Zika and chikungunya, representing a major global public health concern. Owing to the lack of effective vaccines and specific therapeutic options for these infections, vector control remains the main strategy to limit their spread. Traditionally, vector control has relied on extensive use of insecticides combined with the elimination of breeding sites. However, in addition to selecting for insecticide-resistant mosquitoes, concerns have arisen about behavioural effects induced by insecticides, particularly repellency – defined as the ability of a chemical compound to trigger avoidance behaviour in insects, thereby reducing their exposure to treated surfaces. This systematic review aimed to synthesise current knowledge on repellent effects of certain insecticides on A. aegypti.

Methods

A literature search was conducted in the databases Virtual Health Library (BVS), PubMed® and Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO), following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A total of 46 original studies published between 1990 and 2023 were included.

Results

Altogether, 433 bioassays were analysed, of which 69.8% reported repellent effects. The most common methods used to assess repellency were excito-repellency chambers, HITSS assays and the arm-in-cage test. Pyrethroids were used in 86.6% of repellency assays, followed by organochlorines (9.4%). Regarding the resistance profile of tested mosquito populations, susceptible populations exhibited higher frequencies of contact (92.2%) and spatial (77.3%) repellency behaviours than resistant ones (74.1% and 44.0%, respectively).

Conclusions

Our findings indicate that insecticide-induced repellency is common and may interfere with the effectiveness of chemical control strategies. Nevertheless, studies addressing the underlying molecular and sensory mechanisms involved in repellent perception remain scarce.

Graphical Abstract