Scholarlink

<p>Invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) is essential in intensive care, yet aerosols released with ventilator exhaust remain an under-recognized source of airborne transmission and occupational exposure. This review outlines how exhaust-borne aerosols are generated and dispersed in clinical workflows, with amplification during airway suctioning, therapeutic nebulization, and inhaled volatile sedation. We compare principal mitigation options-including heat-and-moisture exchanger (HME) devices and high-efficiency particulate air filtration (HEPA), directed discharge, and chemical inactivation-across effectiveness, operational complexity, adaptability, and strength of evidence. Building on a patient-device-environment framework, we propose a scenario-based, three-tier prevention strategy that aligns patient-side filtration, circuit and exhaust-end control, and ICU room-level airflow engineering with context-appropriate monitoring.</p><p><?noindent??><b>Conclusion</b>: Ventilator-exhaust management is feasible with current technologies, but standardized performance indicators and multicenter studies are needed to quantify reductions in cross-infection and occupational exposure and to inform harmonized technical standards and guidance.</p> Graphical abstract <p></p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Invasive ventilator exhaust in critical care: aerosol transmission risks and management strategies-a narrative review

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年12月8日

查看全文
  • An Shi,
  • Zhenyuan Yang,
  • Ying Peng,
  • Zhenjun Liu,
  • Hanfeng Zhang

摘要

Invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) is essential in intensive care, yet aerosols released with ventilator exhaust remain an under-recognized source of airborne transmission and occupational exposure. This review outlines how exhaust-borne aerosols are generated and dispersed in clinical workflows, with amplification during airway suctioning, therapeutic nebulization, and inhaled volatile sedation. We compare principal mitigation options-including heat-and-moisture exchanger (HME) devices and high-efficiency particulate air filtration (HEPA), directed discharge, and chemical inactivation-across effectiveness, operational complexity, adaptability, and strength of evidence. Building on a patient-device-environment framework, we propose a scenario-based, three-tier prevention strategy that aligns patient-side filtration, circuit and exhaust-end control, and ICU room-level airflow engineering with context-appropriate monitoring.

Conclusion: Ventilator-exhaust management is feasible with current technologies, but standardized performance indicators and multicenter studies are needed to quantify reductions in cross-infection and occupational exposure and to inform harmonized technical standards and guidance.

Graphical abstract