Scholarlink

Background <p>Central venous catheterization is the most common invasive procedure in intensive care units but remains burdened by infectious, thrombotic, and mechanical complications. Although real-time ultrasound guidance is now widely adopted, its effect on site-specific differences in overall complication rates has not been established. The 3SITES randomized clinical trial previously demonstrated lower infection and thrombosis rates with subclavian access but higher mechanical complications. However, as only a third of its procedures were ultrasound-guided in this study, these findings may not apply to current practice. The objective of the study was to compare complication rates across these three sites under a counterfactual framework assuming universal ultrasound guidance.</p> Methods <p>This study was an emulated a target trial using the 3SITES dataset. Inverse probability weighting was applied to adjust for confounders of site assignment and ultrasound guidance. Weighted outcomes across catheter sites were compared under a counterfactual framework assuming universal ultrasound guidance. The primary outcome was a composite of time to catheter-related bloodstream infection or symptomatic deep-vein thrombosis. Secondary outcomes included each component separately, asymptomatic thrombosis, and major mechanical complications.</p> Results <p>A total of 3409 catheters were included: 1153 in the femoral, 1267 in the internal jugular, and 989 in the subclavian site. Subclavian site showed a lower incidence of the primary outcome compared with femoral (<i>P</i> = <i>.02</i>) and jugular (<i>P</i> = <i>.001</i>) sites. The primary composite outcome did not differ between internal jugular and femoral sites (<i>P</i> = <i>.97</i>). Catheter-related bloodstream infections were significantly fewer with subclavian versus jugular access (<i>P</i> = <i>.001</i>). Asymptomatic thrombosis was more frequent at femoral and jugular sites. Major mechanical complications were rare and did not differ significantly across sites.</p> Conclusion <p>Assuming universal real-time ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization, subclavian access retains lower infectious and thrombotic risk without an observed increase in mechanical complications, supporting its preferential use in intensive care units.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Site-specific complications of central venous catheterization under systematic ultrasound guidance: a target trial emulation revisiting the 3SITES study

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年12月2日

查看全文
  • Nicolas Boulet,
  • Antoine Gavoille,
  • Jeanne Iachkine,
  • Benjamin Louart,
  • Harm‑Jan de Grooth,
  • Damien Du Cheyron,
  • Claire Roger,
  • Jean-Jacques Parienti,
  • Nicolas Mongardon,
  • Bruno Mégarbane,
  • Jean-Paul Mira,
  • Pierre Kalfon,
  • Antoine Gros,
  • Sophie Marqué,
  • Marie Thuong,
  • Véronique Pottier,
  • Michel Ramakers,
  • Benoit Savary,
  • Amélie Seguin,
  • Xavier Valette,
  • Nicolas Terzi,
  • Bertrand Sauneuf,
  • Vincent Cattoir,
  • Leonard A Mermel

摘要

Background

Central venous catheterization is the most common invasive procedure in intensive care units but remains burdened by infectious, thrombotic, and mechanical complications. Although real-time ultrasound guidance is now widely adopted, its effect on site-specific differences in overall complication rates has not been established. The 3SITES randomized clinical trial previously demonstrated lower infection and thrombosis rates with subclavian access but higher mechanical complications. However, as only a third of its procedures were ultrasound-guided in this study, these findings may not apply to current practice. The objective of the study was to compare complication rates across these three sites under a counterfactual framework assuming universal ultrasound guidance.

Methods

This study was an emulated a target trial using the 3SITES dataset. Inverse probability weighting was applied to adjust for confounders of site assignment and ultrasound guidance. Weighted outcomes across catheter sites were compared under a counterfactual framework assuming universal ultrasound guidance. The primary outcome was a composite of time to catheter-related bloodstream infection or symptomatic deep-vein thrombosis. Secondary outcomes included each component separately, asymptomatic thrombosis, and major mechanical complications.

Results

A total of 3409 catheters were included: 1153 in the femoral, 1267 in the internal jugular, and 989 in the subclavian site. Subclavian site showed a lower incidence of the primary outcome compared with femoral (P = .02) and jugular (P = .001) sites. The primary composite outcome did not differ between internal jugular and femoral sites (P = .97). Catheter-related bloodstream infections were significantly fewer with subclavian versus jugular access (P = .001). Asymptomatic thrombosis was more frequent at femoral and jugular sites. Major mechanical complications were rare and did not differ significantly across sites.

Conclusion

Assuming universal real-time ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization, subclavian access retains lower infectious and thrombotic risk without an observed increase in mechanical complications, supporting its preferential use in intensive care units.