Scholarlink

Background <p>Lung ultrasound is essential for rapid, radiation-free bedside pneumothorax diagnosis but limited by variability in human interpretation. Key gaps include insufficiently large and diverse human datasets, inconsistent image acquisition, lack of rigorous expert benchmarking, and inadequate clinical interpretability of existing artificial intelligence models. We aimed to develop and validate a robust, explainable artificial intelligence (AI) ensemble model addressing these critical gaps.</p> Methods <p>With our multidisciplinary team, we developed an explainable soft-voting ensemble model trained on 1,856 diverse ultrasound clips from critically ill patients, healthy volunteers, and tailored cadaver models. Model interpretability was ensured using visualization, with heatmaps validated by expert clinicians. The model’s diagnostic performance was rigorously benchmarked against 11 experienced clinicians using an independent, balanced test set. Statistical analyses included sensitivity, specificity and inter-rater reliability.</p> Results <p>The ensemble model achieved 100% sensitivity (95% CI: 85·8%-100·0%) and 100% specificity (95% CI: 85·8%-100·0%), surpassing expert sensitivity and specificity. Diagnostic performance of experts significantly differed by ultrasound mode, with notably lower specificity in M-mode imaging (<i>p</i> &lt; 0·001). The AI consistently maintained perfect sensitivity and significantly reduced false positives compared to clinicians across all conditions, including challenging diagnostic scenarios (e.g., subtle pleural motions), and showed excellent generalizability to both cadaveric and clinical cases.</p> Conclusions <p>Our explainable AI ensemble robustly matches the consensus-level performance of an expert "committee," significantly reducing diagnostic variability and false-positive diagnoses. This AI tool can serve as a critical second reader, standardize clinical decisions at the bedside, and substantially improve patient safety.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Explainable transfer learning ensemble AI model for lung ultrasound pneumothorax detection with expert benchmark

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年4月17日

查看全文
  • Gábor Orosz,
  • Róbert Zsolt Szabó,
  • Marcell Szabó,
  • Pál Gyombolai,
  • József T. Tóth,
  • Tamás Ruttkay,
  • Tamás Ferenci,
  • Tamás Ungi,
  • Gábor Fichtinger,
  • Tamás Haidegger

摘要

Background

Lung ultrasound is essential for rapid, radiation-free bedside pneumothorax diagnosis but limited by variability in human interpretation. Key gaps include insufficiently large and diverse human datasets, inconsistent image acquisition, lack of rigorous expert benchmarking, and inadequate clinical interpretability of existing artificial intelligence models. We aimed to develop and validate a robust, explainable artificial intelligence (AI) ensemble model addressing these critical gaps.

Methods

With our multidisciplinary team, we developed an explainable soft-voting ensemble model trained on 1,856 diverse ultrasound clips from critically ill patients, healthy volunteers, and tailored cadaver models. Model interpretability was ensured using visualization, with heatmaps validated by expert clinicians. The model’s diagnostic performance was rigorously benchmarked against 11 experienced clinicians using an independent, balanced test set. Statistical analyses included sensitivity, specificity and inter-rater reliability.

Results

The ensemble model achieved 100% sensitivity (95% CI: 85·8%-100·0%) and 100% specificity (95% CI: 85·8%-100·0%), surpassing expert sensitivity and specificity. Diagnostic performance of experts significantly differed by ultrasound mode, with notably lower specificity in M-mode imaging (p < 0·001). The AI consistently maintained perfect sensitivity and significantly reduced false positives compared to clinicians across all conditions, including challenging diagnostic scenarios (e.g., subtle pleural motions), and showed excellent generalizability to both cadaveric and clinical cases.

Conclusions

Our explainable AI ensemble robustly matches the consensus-level performance of an expert "committee," significantly reducing diagnostic variability and false-positive diagnoses. This AI tool can serve as a critical second reader, standardize clinical decisions at the bedside, and substantially improve patient safety.