Objective <p>To provide the first comprehensive bibliometric analysis of global scientific literature on coronary revascularization over the past two decades, mapping publication trends, influential contributors, collaborative networks, and the evolution of research hotspots.</p> Methods <p>A systematic search of the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) was conducted for English-language articles and reviews on CAD revascularization published between 1 January 2005 and 30 September 2024. Bibliometric analyses were performed using Microsoft Excel, the <i>bibliometrix</i> R package, CiteSpace, and VOSviewer. Key parameters included association strength (VOSviewer), Pathfinder pruning and Latent Dirichlet Allocation (CiteSpace), with core indicators (MCP ratio, H-index, link strength) integrated to ensure rigor. A PRISMA-style flowchart detailed the literature selection process.</p> Results <p>The analysis included 372 publications from 55 countries. European countries led in publication volume, while the United States demonstrated high citation impact. Leading institutions included Erasmus MC, Imperial College London, and the Cardiovascular Research Foundation. Serruys PW and Stone GW emerged as influential authors, with <i>EuroIntervention</i>, <i>The Lancet</i>, and <i>Circulation</i> as core journals. Keyword and citation analyses identified three dominant themes: comparative effectiveness of PCI vs. CABG, minimally invasive revascularization techniques, and technological innovations (e.g., OCT/IVUS, bioadaptable stents). Temporal evolution revealed a shift toward personalized strategies and AI-assisted intervention<i>.</i></p> Conclusion <p>This study provides the first comprehensive bibliometric synthesis of CAD revascularization research, highlighting global productivity, collaboration, and thematic trends from device optimization to personalized, strategy-oriented care. The findings offer a structured reference for clinicians, researchers, and policymakers to navigate the field’s intellectual foundations and emerging directions.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Global trends and research hotspots in coronary revascularization for ischemic heart disease: a bibliometric analysis (2005–2024)

  • Jia-ming He,
  • Ying-qin Kong,
  • Ding-Jun Wang,
  • Xin-hai Feng,
  • Yuhao Dong,
  • Zhe-hao Yin,
  • Dong Zhou

摘要

Objective

To provide the first comprehensive bibliometric analysis of global scientific literature on coronary revascularization over the past two decades, mapping publication trends, influential contributors, collaborative networks, and the evolution of research hotspots.

Methods

A systematic search of the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) was conducted for English-language articles and reviews on CAD revascularization published between 1 January 2005 and 30 September 2024. Bibliometric analyses were performed using Microsoft Excel, the bibliometrix R package, CiteSpace, and VOSviewer. Key parameters included association strength (VOSviewer), Pathfinder pruning and Latent Dirichlet Allocation (CiteSpace), with core indicators (MCP ratio, H-index, link strength) integrated to ensure rigor. A PRISMA-style flowchart detailed the literature selection process.

Results

The analysis included 372 publications from 55 countries. European countries led in publication volume, while the United States demonstrated high citation impact. Leading institutions included Erasmus MC, Imperial College London, and the Cardiovascular Research Foundation. Serruys PW and Stone GW emerged as influential authors, with EuroIntervention, The Lancet, and Circulation as core journals. Keyword and citation analyses identified three dominant themes: comparative effectiveness of PCI vs. CABG, minimally invasive revascularization techniques, and technological innovations (e.g., OCT/IVUS, bioadaptable stents). Temporal evolution revealed a shift toward personalized strategies and AI-assisted intervention.

Conclusion

This study provides the first comprehensive bibliometric synthesis of CAD revascularization research, highlighting global productivity, collaboration, and thematic trends from device optimization to personalized, strategy-oriented care. The findings offer a structured reference for clinicians, researchers, and policymakers to navigate the field’s intellectual foundations and emerging directions.