Scholarlink

Background <p>It remains unclear whether syndesmotic fixation technique impacts outcomes following ankle fracture surgery. This study investigates which repair technique, transyndesmotic screws, Suture Button (SB), and suture tape augmentation (STA), results in fewest complications and best functional outcomes measured by Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) computerized adaptive tests (CATs) of physical function (PF) and pain interference (PI).</p> Methods <p>782 patients who underwent ankle fracture surgery at a single institution between 2016 and 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Two fellowship-trained orthopaedic surgeons independently reviewed all radiographs, determined fixation technique, and assessed complications. Open fractures, pilons, and neuropathies were excluded. 252 had syndesmotic injury identified via intraoperative fluoroscopy. 159/252 who had minimum one-year radiographic follow-up were included for complications analysis. These 159 were sent post-operative PROMIS CATs. 68/159 consented and were included for final analysis of PROMIS. Kruskal-Wallis test compared PROMIS across repair types. Multinomial logistic regression adjusted for propensity scores included as covariates modeled PROMIS by technique.</p> Results <p>62/159 had screw, 59/159 SB, and 38/159 STA. Screw complication rate was 12.9% (8/62): 8.1% (5/62) degenerative joint disease (DJD), 6.5% (4/62) syndesmotic malreduction. SB complication rate was 1.7% (1/59): 1.7% (1/59) DJD. STA had no radiographic complications. Mean PF was 50.5 ± 7.9 screw, 53.9 ± 9.7 SB, and 52.2 ± 13.1 STA (<i>p</i> = 0.72). Mean PI was 49.6 ± 8.2 screw, 47.9 ± 8.8 SB, and 49.2 ± 10.5 STA (<i>p</i> = 0.75). Mean PF was 5.1-points (95%CI: -0.9-11.1) higher for SB and 5.2-points (95%CI: -1.3-11.7) greater for STA vs. screw. Mean PI was 3.2-points less for SB (-3.2, 95%CI:-8.5-2.1) and 4.4-points less for STA (-4.4, 95%CI: -10.1-1.3) vs. screws.</p> Conclusions <p>Syndesmotic fixation with either SB or STA reduces complications compared to screw. While this study was underpowered to detect differences in PROMIS, improved PROMIS for SB and STA vs. screws suggest that these techniques may result in better functional outcomes compared to screws.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Does syndesmotic fixation technique impact complication rates and functional outcomes measured by PROMIS scores following operative repair of ankle fractures?

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年8月6日

查看全文
  • Steven M. Hadley Jr.,
  • Rachel Bergman,
  • John J. Peabody,
  • Sarah J. Westvold,
  • Ryan Filler,
  • Muhammad Mutawakkil,
  • Milap Patel,
  • Anish R. Kadakia

摘要

Background

It remains unclear whether syndesmotic fixation technique impacts outcomes following ankle fracture surgery. This study investigates which repair technique, transyndesmotic screws, Suture Button (SB), and suture tape augmentation (STA), results in fewest complications and best functional outcomes measured by Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) computerized adaptive tests (CATs) of physical function (PF) and pain interference (PI).

Methods

782 patients who underwent ankle fracture surgery at a single institution between 2016 and 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Two fellowship-trained orthopaedic surgeons independently reviewed all radiographs, determined fixation technique, and assessed complications. Open fractures, pilons, and neuropathies were excluded. 252 had syndesmotic injury identified via intraoperative fluoroscopy. 159/252 who had minimum one-year radiographic follow-up were included for complications analysis. These 159 were sent post-operative PROMIS CATs. 68/159 consented and were included for final analysis of PROMIS. Kruskal-Wallis test compared PROMIS across repair types. Multinomial logistic regression adjusted for propensity scores included as covariates modeled PROMIS by technique.

Results

62/159 had screw, 59/159 SB, and 38/159 STA. Screw complication rate was 12.9% (8/62): 8.1% (5/62) degenerative joint disease (DJD), 6.5% (4/62) syndesmotic malreduction. SB complication rate was 1.7% (1/59): 1.7% (1/59) DJD. STA had no radiographic complications. Mean PF was 50.5 ± 7.9 screw, 53.9 ± 9.7 SB, and 52.2 ± 13.1 STA (p = 0.72). Mean PI was 49.6 ± 8.2 screw, 47.9 ± 8.8 SB, and 49.2 ± 10.5 STA (p = 0.75). Mean PF was 5.1-points (95%CI: -0.9-11.1) higher for SB and 5.2-points (95%CI: -1.3-11.7) greater for STA vs. screw. Mean PI was 3.2-points less for SB (-3.2, 95%CI:-8.5-2.1) and 4.4-points less for STA (-4.4, 95%CI: -10.1-1.3) vs. screws.

Conclusions

Syndesmotic fixation with either SB or STA reduces complications compared to screw. While this study was underpowered to detect differences in PROMIS, improved PROMIS for SB and STA vs. screws suggest that these techniques may result in better functional outcomes compared to screws.