Scholarlink

Objective <p>To systematically evaluate the effects of vertebroplasty (VP) and kyphoplasty (KP) on pain and spinal imaging parameters in patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCF).</p> Methods <p>A comprehensive search of eight databases was conducted from inception to November 2024 to identify randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in Chinese and English. Eligible studies included clinical RCTs comparing KP and VP in patients with OVCF, assessing vertebral pain and imaging parameters. Risk of bias and methodological quality were assessed using the Cochrane Appraisal Tool. Combined effects were calculated using a random effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed using the <i>I</i><sup><i>2</i></sup> test.</p> Results <p>A total of 16 randomised controlled trials involving 1738 patients were included. The analysis revealed no statistically significant difference between KP and VP in pain reduction (<i>SMD</i> = 0.08, <i>95% CI</i> = -0.04 to 0.20, <i>P</i> = 0. 19) or spinal function (<i>SMD</i> = 0.04, <i>95% CI</i> = -0.11 to -0.19, <i>P</i> = 0. 62). However, KP demonstrated significantly better outcomes than VP in vertebral compression rate (<i>SMD</i> = 1.39, <i>95% CI</i> = 0.81 to 1.96, <i>P</i> &lt; 0. 00001), Cobb angle (<i>SMD</i> = 1.83, <i>95% CI</i> = 0.99 to 2.68, <i>P</i> &lt; 0. 0001) and the incidence of cement leakage (<i>OR</i> = 1.92, <i>95% CI</i> = 1.41 to 2.62, <i>P</i> &lt; 0. 0001).</p> Conclusion <p>Our results suggest that KP is more effective than VP in improving postoperative vertebral compression rate and Cobb angle, and reducing the incidence of cement leakage.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Effect of vertebral kyphoplasty versus vertebroplasty on pain and indicators of imaging parameters of the injured vertebrae in patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a meta-analysis

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年2月25日

查看全文
  • Zhenjun You,
  • Keqin Wu,
  • Yi Jiang,
  • Jing Chen

摘要

Objective

To systematically evaluate the effects of vertebroplasty (VP) and kyphoplasty (KP) on pain and spinal imaging parameters in patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCF).

Methods

A comprehensive search of eight databases was conducted from inception to November 2024 to identify randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in Chinese and English. Eligible studies included clinical RCTs comparing KP and VP in patients with OVCF, assessing vertebral pain and imaging parameters. Risk of bias and methodological quality were assessed using the Cochrane Appraisal Tool. Combined effects were calculated using a random effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 test.

Results

A total of 16 randomised controlled trials involving 1738 patients were included. The analysis revealed no statistically significant difference between KP and VP in pain reduction (SMD = 0.08, 95% CI = -0.04 to 0.20, P = 0. 19) or spinal function (SMD = 0.04, 95% CI = -0.11 to -0.19, P = 0. 62). However, KP demonstrated significantly better outcomes than VP in vertebral compression rate (SMD = 1.39, 95% CI = 0.81 to 1.96, P < 0. 00001), Cobb angle (SMD = 1.83, 95% CI = 0.99 to 2.68, P < 0. 0001) and the incidence of cement leakage (OR = 1.92, 95% CI = 1.41 to 2.62, P < 0. 0001).

Conclusion

Our results suggest that KP is more effective than VP in improving postoperative vertebral compression rate and Cobb angle, and reducing the incidence of cement leakage.