Background <p>Damage Control Surgery is a technique aimed at reducing mortality in trauma patients, but its use in pediatric patients lacks standardized indications. Proper patient selection is essential to mitigate morbidity associated with Damage Control Surgery.</p> Objective <p>This review aims to clarify the reported indications for Damage Control Surgery in pediatric trauma patients.</p> Methods <p>A systematic search of PubMed and Embase was conducted without publication year restrictions to identify studies reporting indications for performing Damage Control Surgery in pediatric trauma patients. Backward citation analysis was performed on identified review articles that were excluded. Indications or patient characteristics guiding surgical decision-making in the emergency department were extracted and categorized.</p> Results <p>Forty studies were included: 25 case reports, 13 case series, and 2 observational studies. The case reports and case series involved 98 patients with 368 reported indications, with severe trauma (26.1%), hemodynamic instability (18.2%), and radiological or clinical evidence of severe hemorrhage or contamination (28.2%) being the most observed. The observational studies found a higher Injury Severity Score, lower systolic blood pressure, decreased Glasgow Coma Scale, lower body temperature, and more frequent blood transfusions in the Damage Control Surgery groups compared to the control groups.</p> Conclusions and relevance <p>Severe trauma, hemodynamic instability, and injuries related to severe hemorrhage or contamination emerged as key indications for Damage Control Surgery in pediatric trauma, consistent with findings in adult trauma populations. However, the lethal triad of acidosis, hypothermia and coagulopathy was infrequently reported as a primary indication for Damage Control Surgery in children. This may reflect the greater compensatory capacity of pediatric patients, potentially delaying the manifestation of these physiological derangements. Our findings suggest that early intervention with Damage Control Surgery in cases of severe trauma, exsanguination, gross contamination, and hemodynamic instability may help prevent the progression to critical physiological states such as the lethal triad. This underscores the importance of timely recognition and intervention in pediatric trauma management.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Indications to perform damage control surgery in pediatric trauma: a scoping review—Are children little adults?

  • Kris R. Wiendels,
  • Joris Lemson,
  • Manouk Backes,
  • Erik Hermans,
  • Jan Bollen,
  • Diederik P. J. Smeeing,
  • Stijn D. Nelen,
  • Ivo de Blaauw,
  • Allard Hosman,
  • Allon van Uitert,
  • Diederik Smeeing,
  • Elisa Hamer,
  • Elke Arts,
  • Erik Hermans,
  • Fay Sanders,
  • Hisse Arnts,
  • Jan Bollen,
  • Joris Lemson,
  • Lily Verhagen,
  • Maarten Stessel,
  • Malou Holtzer,
  • Manouk Backes,
  • Marie-Louise Loos,
  • Mila Leeuwerik,
  • Nienke Maas,
  • Ozcan Sir,
  • Stijn Nelen,
  • Tjarda Tromp

摘要

Background

Damage Control Surgery is a technique aimed at reducing mortality in trauma patients, but its use in pediatric patients lacks standardized indications. Proper patient selection is essential to mitigate morbidity associated with Damage Control Surgery.

Objective

This review aims to clarify the reported indications for Damage Control Surgery in pediatric trauma patients.

Methods

A systematic search of PubMed and Embase was conducted without publication year restrictions to identify studies reporting indications for performing Damage Control Surgery in pediatric trauma patients. Backward citation analysis was performed on identified review articles that were excluded. Indications or patient characteristics guiding surgical decision-making in the emergency department were extracted and categorized.

Results

Forty studies were included: 25 case reports, 13 case series, and 2 observational studies. The case reports and case series involved 98 patients with 368 reported indications, with severe trauma (26.1%), hemodynamic instability (18.2%), and radiological or clinical evidence of severe hemorrhage or contamination (28.2%) being the most observed. The observational studies found a higher Injury Severity Score, lower systolic blood pressure, decreased Glasgow Coma Scale, lower body temperature, and more frequent blood transfusions in the Damage Control Surgery groups compared to the control groups.

Conclusions and relevance

Severe trauma, hemodynamic instability, and injuries related to severe hemorrhage or contamination emerged as key indications for Damage Control Surgery in pediatric trauma, consistent with findings in adult trauma populations. However, the lethal triad of acidosis, hypothermia and coagulopathy was infrequently reported as a primary indication for Damage Control Surgery in children. This may reflect the greater compensatory capacity of pediatric patients, potentially delaying the manifestation of these physiological derangements. Our findings suggest that early intervention with Damage Control Surgery in cases of severe trauma, exsanguination, gross contamination, and hemodynamic instability may help prevent the progression to critical physiological states such as the lethal triad. This underscores the importance of timely recognition and intervention in pediatric trauma management.